[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI Work Plan

[Carlton Samuels]

...all the elements are there....looks like a winning plan to me!

Don may recall the subgroup approach was used in another WG - Chaired by
Mikey and where he was one subgroup leader - with great effect.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Jim Bikoff <jbikoff at sgbdc.com> wrote:

>  Dear Don,
>
>
>
> As you indicated, a Work Plan should help guide our Group's efforts over
> the upcoming weeks. We have some suggestions, based on our positive
> experience in the IGO/INGO PDP Working Group.
>
>
>
> Please give us the benefit of your thoughts on the following suggested
> Work Plan:
>
>
>
> 1.      Summarize and compile Working Group survey
> responses --possibly in an Excel file, circulated among Group members.
> This should be a task for ICANN Staff.
>
>
>
> 2.      Based on Working Group survey responses, clarify the terminology
> and issues in each Group of the Charter questions. Identify consensus or
> near-consensus responses and hold Consensus Call on these issues.
>
>
>
>  3.     Create Working Group  sub-teams to work on issues by group: (a)
> Registration; (b) Maintenance; (c) Contact; (d) Relay; (e) Reveal; (f)
> Publication; (g) Termination.  Note that the current groupings of questions
> do not include "Publication" or "Termination" categories.  We propose
> adding these categories, which would include questions taken out of other
> current categories, as identified in the attached redline draft.  Note also
> that the remaining questions in the Main Issues group, an overarching
> category, would be addressed organically as a result of this proposed
> process.
>
>
>
>       a) Each sub-team produces a report, which is delivered to Don by
> each Friday or Saturday at the latest, so it can be combined by staff with
> the other sub-team reports and discussed at the upcoming Tuesday Working
> Group teleconference.
>
>
>
>       b) When the responses to the survey come in from the other
> constituencies, ICANN staff summarizes the responses for the Working Group.
> Each sub-team then analyzes the constituencies' and Working
> Group's responses (including majority and minority views) in its area, and
> delivers the result to Don by Friday or Saturday, so ICANN staff can
> combine it all in one document, such as an Excel file, for full Working
> Group review.
>
>
>
>  4. Working Group holds Consensus Call and revises final Excel file of
> responses to survey accordingly.
>
>
>
> 5.    Draft report presenting (1) Consensus Proposals (if any); (2)
> Non-Consensus Proposals w/ Levels of Support; (3) Minority Views w/Levels
> of Support.
>
>
>
>  6.  Present Report for Public Comment.
>
>
>
> This process will provide a means to circle back to the remaining Main
> Issues questions.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> James L. Bikoff
>
> Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
>
> 1101 30th Street, NW
>
> Suite 120
>
> Washington, DC 20007
>
> Tel: 202-944-3303
>
> Fax: 202-944-3306
>
> jbikoff at sgbdc.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140128/88367050/attachment.html>