[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list

Tim Ruiz tim at godaddy.com
Thu May 22 16:39:35 UTC 2014 

Right, anyone from the other SOs/ACs may join the WG, comment on anything we put out for public comment, etc. But I see no need to formally request their input as you seemed to suggest.

Tim


> On May 22, 2014, at 11:36 AM, "Kiran Malancharuvil" <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
> 
> You are incorrect Tim. Other SO and AC's are ALWAYS welcome to provide input in ANY GNSO working group.
> 
> Kiran
> 
> Kiran Malancharuvil 
> Internet Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> 415-419-9138 (m) 
> 
> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. 
> 
>> On May 22, 2014, at 9:29 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This is not a cross SO/AC WG. It is a GNSO PDP on a matter that is under the GNSO umbrella of issues. As such, what we need is SG and C input/feedback.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 22, 2014, at 10:35 AM, "Kiran Malancharuvil" <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Exactly our point.  I believe you also made this point a couple weeks ago. Despite the number of individual voices, there hasn't been a lot of diverse (from an SO/AC perspective) input. To that point, there should probably be outreach on this point. 
>>> 
>>> K
>>> 
>>> Kiran Malancharuvil 
>>> Internet Policy Counselor
>>> MarkMonitor
>>> 415-419-9138 (m) 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. 
>>> 
>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:32 AM, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> To Steve¹s point: What other SO/ACs are speaking on this? Aren¹t we all
>>>> (or at least the vocal elements) GNSO?
>>>> 
>>>> J.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/22/14, 10:05 , "Kiran Malancharuvil"
>>>> <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I believe we intended to make clear that, as working group members, we do
>>>>> not vote as individuals but rather as representatives of our individual
>>>>> SO/AC/C. While a vote hasn't taken place yet, it's important to remember
>>>>> that sheer volume of vocal individuals isn't the point, regardless of
>>>>> where you fall on the issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> K
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
>>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
>>>>> MarkMonitor
>>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:01 AM, "Metalitz, Steven"
>>>>> <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Libby, this is a helpful contribution.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you clarify one point:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ³However, a number of WG members, representing their SO/AC/C,
>>>>> disagreedŠ.²  Which SO/AC/C are you referring to ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steve
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Libby Baney [mailto:libby.baney at fwdstrategies.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:55 AM
>>>>> To: Marika Konings
>>>>> Cc: Metalitz, Steven;
>>>>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>>>>> 
>>>>> All -- as evidenced on last week's call, there is concern about the
>>>>> language in the draft conclusion for Cat C threshold question. Per the
>>>>> request for specific edits, attached are redlined edits to the template
>>>>> submitted for the group's consideration by FWD Strategies Int'l,
>>>>> LegitScript, MarkMonitor and DomainTools. We look forward to your
>>>>> comments and further discussion if needed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Libby
>>>>> 
>>>>> www.FWDstrategies.com<http://www.FWDstrategies.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Marika Konings
>>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>> wrote:
>>>>> Following on from Steve's emails, please find attached the updated
>>>>> templates for C3 and D1, incorporating the notes from the meeting (if
>>>>> I've missed anything, please share your comments / edits with the mailing
>>>>> list). To re-emphasise the action items from the meeting:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.  Please provide your input on the draft preliminary conclusion for C
>>>>> threshold, C1 and C2 as circulated by Don. Several of you suggested
>>>>> removing the word 'overwhelming' from the draft. Are there any other
>>>>> proposed edits?
>>>>> 2.  Please provide your input on question C3, especially if you are of
>>>>> the view that there should be differences in the data fields displayed
>>>>> for commercial entity and natural person P/P registrations.
>>>>> 3.  Please provide your input on question D1, especially whether it
>>>>> would be desirable to have a public registry of P/P services contact
>>>>> information and a requirement to respond to enquiries both from P/P
>>>>> customers as well as those looking to contact P/P customers. Input on
>>>>> what would qualify as a 'response' and a possible timeframe for responses
>>>>> are also encouraged.
>>>>> 4.  Kathy and James will provide an update at the next meeting on
>>>>> issues surrounding transfers between registrars of P/P registrations and
>>>>> possible questions the WG may want to address in this context.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marika
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: <Metalitz>, Steven <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday 20 May 2014 18:06
>>>>> To: Marika Konings
>>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
>>>>> "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>>>>> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
>>>>> Subject: PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks to all participants on today¹s call.  Following up on requests
>>>>> made on the call ----
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regarding Don¹s draft preliminary text regarding questions C(threshold),
>>>>> C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and (especially welcomed!)
>>>>> proposed edits.  Don¹s draft is re-attached here for ready reference.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regarding question C.3:  If the following applies to you, please respond
>>>>> on the list:
>>>>> 
>>>>> IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open to commercial
>>>>> entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a difference in
>>>>> the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is displayed for p/p
>>>>> registrations by natural persons)?  If the answer is YES, please specify
>>>>> the differences.
>>>>> 
>>>>> For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that any YES
>>>>> people will step forward on the list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steve Metalitz, vice chair
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: 
>>>>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann
>>>>> .org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika
>>>>> Konings
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
>>>>> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>>>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG Meeting
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI WG Meeting.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marika
>>>>> 
>>>>> Proposed Agenda ­ PPSAI WG Meeting ­ 20 May 2014
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.  Roll Call / SOI
>>>>> 2.  Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold question, C1
>>>>> and C2 (as circulated by Don)
>>>>> 3.  Review C3 ­ is additional response/discussion needed in light of
>>>>> item 2? (see template attached)
>>>>> 4.  Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template attached)
>>>>> 5.  Next steps / confirm next meeting
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Libby Baney, JD
>>>>> President
>>>>> FWD Strategies International
>>>>> www.fwdstrategies.com<http://www.fwdstrategies.com>
>>>>> P: 202-499-2296
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list