[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list

[Chris Pelling]

I agree with Michele on this, both points.

Please remember any flag (if agreed) would also need to go through with
registriers as well, those being of the "thick" type.

Kind regards,
Chris

On 20/05/14 23:06, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
> Personally I think two things:
>
> 1 -- P/P services should be open to anyone who wants to use them
>
> 2 -- the display in whois should be the same no matter who or what has
> registered the domain
>
>  
>
> With respect to point 2, I don't have any issue with there being a
> "flag" of some kind to indicate that a registration record is using an
> accredited P/P
>
>  
>
> Regards
>
>  
>
> Michele
>
>  
>
>  
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting & Colocation, Domains
>
> http://www.blacknight.co/
>
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
>
> http://www.technology.ie
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>
> Locall: 1850 929 929
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>  
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Metalitz,
> Steven
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:07 PM
> *To:* 'Marika Konings'; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>
>  
>
> Thanks to all participants on today's call.  Following up on requests
> made on the call ----
>
>  
>
> Regarding Don's draft preliminary text regarding questions
> C(threshold), C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and
> (especially welcomed!) proposed edits.  Don's draft is re-attached
> here for ready reference.
>
>  
>
> Regarding question C.3:  If the following applies to you, please
> respond on the list:
>
>  
>
> IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open to
> commercial entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a
> difference in the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is
> displayed for p/p registrations by natural persons)?  If the answer is
> YES, please specify the differences.  
>
>  
>
> For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that any YES
> people will step forward on the list. 
>
>  
>
> Thanks!
>
>  
>
> Steve Metalitz, vice chair
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG Meeting
>
>  
>
> Dear All,
>
>  
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI WG Meeting.
>
>  
>
> Best regards,
>
>  
>
> Marika
>
>  
>
> *Proposed Agenda -- PPSAI WG Meeting -- 20 May 2014*
>
>  1. Roll Call / SOI
>  2. Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold question, C1
>     and C2 (as circulated by Don)
>  3. Review C3 -- is additional response/discussion needed in light of
>     item 2? (see template attached)
>  4. Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template attached)
>  5. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140522/b415b3b5/attachment-0001.html>