[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list

Fri May 23 15:03:31 UTC 2014

I am a mother and found it offensive as well. I use whois all day long.

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Rosette, Kristina <krosette at cov.com>wrote:

> I also found it offensive - but not as offensive as the recent string
> confusion objection public comment that claimed to simplify the issue so
> "even a housewife could understand."
>
> Regardless, I'm of the view that it's better handled by the Ombudsman as
> it's a broader, ICANN-wide issue. That email is on my to do list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:58 AM
> To: Kiran Malancharuvil
> Cc: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>
> Oh good grief! Any reasonable person understood what was meant and that
> nothing sexist was intended. By trying to label it that way you are the one
> attempting to deminish another. I am sorry, but I can't let that continue
> without saying something. If by chance you really are serious, then Kiran I
> can only suggest you get a thicker skin if you intend to continue in these
> WGs.
>
> Tim
>
>
> > On May 23, 2014, at 8:53 AM, "Kiran Malancharuvil" <
> Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
> >
> > Volker,
> >
> > I actually can NOT believe that you are attempting to justify a comment
> that is so clearly sexist and demeaning on it's face.  Of course you don't
> see the offense in a comment that does not apply to you.
> >
> > I will not apologize or back down from my pending request for an apology
> in that matter.
> >
> > That being said, at what point have I refused to discuss or contribute
> to the substance, or "meat" of the issue? At what point did my request for
> an apology color my contribution or my willingness to engage?
> >
> > If you will go back and look at my earlier email, I only used the sexist
> comment to illustrate that there is, largely, no "blood feud" as you put it.
> >
> > K
> >
> > Kiran Malancharuvil
> > Internet Policy Counselor
> > MarkMonitor
> > 415-419-9138 (m)
> >
> > Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >
> >> On May 23, 2014, at 8:38 AM, "Volker Greimann" <
> vgreimann at key-systems.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Isn't that part of the problem? Needing an apology for a comment that
> was in all likelyhood not meant as an offense?
> >>
> >> I did not make the comment and I do not remember who did, but my mother
> does not know what whois is yet she is quite internet savvy. Do we really
> need to put every word uttered up for debate? Would the comment have been
> better as "97.63% of all mothers probably don't know what Whois is"? Should
> we really care about this more than the substantive issues we are trying to
> solve here?
> >>
> >> If we all agree to try not to be offended by every word said in haste
> or without concern, we might actually get this done. Let us focus on the
> meat, not the fluff or distractions.
> >>
> >> Edit: Now I looked at the transcript and know who said what, but I
> cannot for the heck see an intentional insult there. Agreed to move on?
> >>
> >> Enjoy your vacation,
> >>
> >> V.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 23.05.2014 15:24, schrieb Kiran Malancharuvil:
> >>> So then we agree to elevate the level of discourse, which is my point.
> >>>
> >>> Frankly, I'm still waiting for an apology from whoever said that
> "mothers don't know what Whois is." Other than that, I see no "feud," but I
> do think that there is an inordinate amount of individuals brushing off
> other legitimate concerns. That's what I aim to eliminate.
> >>>
> >>> It's not personal Volker, it's that I have every right in this forum
> and others to ensure that my side of the issue is fairly represented and
> that language choices in the documents don't unfairly color the public
> perception of the situation.
> >>>
> >>> Now if you'll excuse me, I am supposed to be on vacation.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Kiran
> >>>
> >>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>> MarkMonitor
> >>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>
> >>>> On May 23, 2014, at 8:06 AM, "Volker Greimann" <
> vgreimann at key-systems.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I have no issues with other people clearly deliniating their
> positions. OTOH, endless discussions about rodents lairs, making blanket
> assumptions about initial draft documents, calling others disrespectful,
> unnecessary, and inappropriate seems to be less than helpful to the
> continued progress of this group. We need constructive work.
> >>>>
> >>>> We are all here to get a good, solid result here, not to start
> blood-feuds. I hope everyone remembers that before anything else, we need
> to be a tam to achieve results. Sure, we may have different opinions on
> certain issues, but if we cannot cooperate, we are doomed to fail. We
> should all remember this.
> >>>>
> >>>> No result here means that the p/p spec in the 2013 RAA will expire
> without having been replaced by a sold foundation for all p/p services.
> >>>>
> >>>> No offense,
> >>>>
> >>>> Volker
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 23.05.2014 14:57, schrieb Kiran Malancharuvil:
> >>>>> We did propose a change, and we are discussing on the list in order
> to avoid taking precious time on the call.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, please refrain from calling other peoples positions a waste of
> time. It's disrespectful, unnecessary, and inappropriate for professional
> discourse.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kiran
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>>>> MarkMonitor
> >>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 23, 2014, at 7:30 AM, "Volker Greimann" <
> vgreimann at key-systems.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does it really matter? Do we need to waste next weeks call on the
> word "overwhelming"?
> >>>>>> Propose a change, then move on.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Volker
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 23.05.2014 14:10, schrieb Kiran Malancharuvil:
> >>>>>>> So if everyone is so well aware, why did we end up with a document
> with the wording "overwhelming majority"?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> K
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>>>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>>>>>> MarkMonitor
> >>>>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On May 23, 2014, at 4:32 AM, "Volker Greimann" <
> vgreimann at key-systems.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We are well aware of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines and what
> the different levels of consensus mean. Tim is right: there does not need
> to be a vote to determine if a position is a consensus position.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For example, from the current discussion results, the
> determination for the question of whether to prohibit commercialy used
> domain names from p/p services seems to be Divergence/No Consensus.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Volker
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 22.05.2014 18:37, schrieb Kiran Malancharuvil:
> >>>>>>>>> Also incorrect. GNSO guidelines dictate what consensus means.
> Marika provides a link to these guidelines. Individuals are welcome to
> participate and there are guidelines as to how to count those votes.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Kiran
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>>>>>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>>>>>>>> MarkMonitor
> >>>>>>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 9:35 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I will also note that is is not just the SG/C feeback that
> counts. The working group is not restricted to representatives of SGs or
> Cs. Anyone (individuals) may participate, have a voice, and have their
> opinion counted. I believe that's why we have moved away from voting and
> toward the consensus positions. The Chair and Vice Chairs get the wonderful
> job of trying to determine what the consensus is.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Tim
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 11:30 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is not a cross SO/AC WG. It is a GNSO PDP on a matter
> that is under the GNSO umbrella of issues. As such, what we need is SG and
> C input/feedback.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Tim
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 10:35 AM, "Kiran Malancharuvil" <
> Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly our point.  I believe you also made this point a
> couple weeks ago. Despite the number of individual voices, there hasn't
> been a lot of diverse (from an SO/AC perspective) input. To that point,
> there should probably be outreach on this point.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> K
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>>>>>>>>>>> MarkMonitor
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:32 AM, "James M. Bladel" <
> jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To Steve¹s point: What other SO/ACs are speaking on this?
> Aren¹t we all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (or at least the vocal elements) GNSO?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/14, 10:05 , "Kiran Malancharuvil"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe we intended to make clear that, as working group
> members, we do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not vote as individuals but rather as representatives of
> our individual
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SO/AC/C. While a vote hasn't taken place yet, it's
> important to remember
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that sheer volume of vocal individuals isn't the point,
> regardless of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where you fall on the issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> K
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Policy Counselor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MarkMonitor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 415-419-9138 (m)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:01 AM, "Metalitz, Steven"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Libby, this is a helpful contribution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you clarify one point:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ³However, a number of WG members, representing their
> SO/AC/C,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> disagreedŠ.²  Which SO/AC/C are you referring to ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Libby Baney [mailto:libby.baney at fwdstrategies.com]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:55 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Marika Konings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Metalitz, Steven;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for
> list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All -- as evidenced on last week's call, there is concern
> about the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> language in the draft conclusion for Cat C threshold
> question. Per the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request for specific edits, attached are redlined edits to
> the template
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> submitted for the group's consideration by FWD Strategies
> Int'l,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LegitScript, MarkMonitor and DomainTools. We look forward
> to your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments and further discussion if needed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Libby
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.FWDstrategies.com<http://www.FWDstrategies.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Marika Konings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following on from Steve's emails, please find attached the
> updated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> templates for C3 and D1, incorporating the notes from the
> meeting (if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've missed anything, please share your comments / edits
> with the mailing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> list). To re-emphasise the action items from the meeting:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.  Please provide your input on the draft preliminary
> conclusion for C
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threshold, C1 and C2 as circulated by Don. Several of you
> suggested
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> removing the word 'overwhelming' from the draft. Are there
> any other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed edits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.  Please provide your input on question C3, especially if
> you are of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the view that there should be differences in the data
> fields displayed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commercial entity and natural person P/P registrations.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.  Please provide your input on question D1, especially
> whether it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be desirable to have a public registry of P/P
> services contact
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> information and a requirement to respond to enquiries both
> from P/P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> customers as well as those looking to contact P/P
> customers. Input on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what would qualify as a 'response' and a possible timeframe
> for responses
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are also encouraged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.  Kathy and James will provide an update at the next
> meeting on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues surrounding transfers between registrars of P/P
> registrations and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible questions the WG may want to address in this
> context.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marika
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: <Metalitz>, Steven <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday 20 May 2014 18:06
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Marika Konings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org
> >>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: PPSAI WG -- questions for list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all participants on today¹s call.  Following up
> on requests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made on the call ----
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding Don¹s draft preliminary text regarding questions
> C(threshold),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and (especially
> welcomed!)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed edits.  Don¹s draft is re-attached here for ready
> reference.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding question C.3:  If the following applies to you,
> please respond
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the list:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open
> to commercial
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a
> difference in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is
> displayed for p/p
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> registrations by natural persons)?  If the answer is YES,
> please specify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the differences.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that
> any YES
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people will step forward on the list.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Metalitz, vice chair
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Marika
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG
> Meeting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI
> WG Meeting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marika
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposed Agenda  PPSAI WG Meeting 20 May 2014
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.  Roll Call / SOI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.  Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold
> question, C1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and C2 (as circulated by Don)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.  Review C3  is additional response/discussion needed in
> light of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> item 2? (see template attached)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.  Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template
> attached)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.  Next steps / confirm next meeting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Libby Baney, JD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> President
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWD Strategies International
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.fwdstrategies.com<http://www.fwdstrategies.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> P: 202-499-2296
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>>>>>> - Rechtsabteilung -
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>>>>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>>>>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>>>>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>>>>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>>>>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>>>>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> >>>>>>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>>>>>> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>>>>>> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>>>>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den
> angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe,
> Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
> unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten
> wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact us.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>>>>>> - legal department -
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>>>>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>>>>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>>>>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>>>>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>>>>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>>>>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and
> stay updated:
> >>>>>>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>>>>>> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>>>>>> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>>>>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person
> to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
> content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on
> this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this
> e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting
> us by telephone.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>>>>>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>>>> - Rechtsabteilung -
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> >>>>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>>>> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>>>> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den
> angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe,
> Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
> unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten
> wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact us.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>>>> - legal department -
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
> updated:
> >>>>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>>>> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>>>> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to
> whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
> content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on
> this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this
> e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting
> us by telephone.
> >>>> --
> >>>> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> >>>>
> >>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>> - Rechtsabteilung -
> >>>>
> >>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>
> >>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>
> >>>> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> >>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>
> >>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>
> >>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>
> >>>> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den
> angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe,
> Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
> unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten
> wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> >>>>
> >>>> --------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact us.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Volker A. Greimann
> >>>> - legal department -
> >>>>
> >>>> Key-Systems GmbH
> >>>> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >>>> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >>>> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >>>> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >>>> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>>>
> >>>> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >>>> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>>>
> >>>> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
> updated:
> >>>> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >>>> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>>>
> >>>> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> >>>> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >>>> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> >>>>
> >>>> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >>>> www.keydrive.lu
> >>>>
> >>>> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to
> whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
> content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on
> this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this
> e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting
> us by telephone.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> >>
> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> >>
> >> Volker A. Greimann
> >> - Rechtsabteilung -
> >>
> >> Key-Systems GmbH
> >> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>
> >> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>
> >> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> >> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>
> >> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> >> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> >>
> >> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >> www.keydrive.lu
> >>
> >> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
> Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
> Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
> Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
> E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact us.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Volker A. Greimann
> >> - legal department -
> >>
> >> Key-Systems GmbH
> >> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
> >>
> >> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>
> >> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
> updated:
> >> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>
> >> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> >> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> >>
> >> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >> www.keydrive.lu
> >>
> >> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom
> it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of
> this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.
> If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly
> notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> > Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>

-- 
Emily Emanuel
Vice President
LegitScript.com

Follow LegitScript on
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/legitscript-com>
|  Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/LegitScript> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/legitscript>
|  YouTube <https://www.youtube.com/user/LegitScript>  |
Blog<http://blog.legitscript.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140523/7d7ac14d/attachment-0001.html>