[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Questions for P/P providers from the WG call earlier today

[Darcy Southwell]

In response to the Chairs’ specific questions below:

   1. We do not automatically forward to our customers disclosure requests
   ​ that were​
   sent directly to us
   ​ for processing​
   .  If the requester asks us to, we will forward it.
   2. We have not built this “takedown” concept into our process.  At this
   point, disclosure and publication are our only actions.
   3. We require a valid court order or subpoena before disclosing
   information that is not already publicly available.
   4. N/A
   5. N/A

Domain.com’s Domain Privacy Service TOS is available here
<http://www.domain.com/legal/legal_domain.bml#domain-privacy-service>.


[image: Description: Description: compass-high-res 2]

*Darcy Southwell*

Director, Registrar Compliance | *The Endurance International Group*

Mobile +1.503.453.7305 | darcy.southwell at endurance.com | Skype:
darcy.enyeart


From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 3:38 PM
To: PPSAI WG <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Questions for P/P providers from the WG call
earlier today

Dear WG members,

With the Chairs’ consent, I’m sending on the questions that were asked by
several WG members during the call earlier today, in the hopes that those
members who are or know of P/P providers and their practices can respond.
If links to or copies of provider practices and policies can be provided,
that would be very helpful too.

   1. What are provider practices regarding customer notification when a
   disclosure request is received, and is the customer given the opportunity
   to respond? (Note - on the call, James had agreed to provide information
   about DBP; Graeme and Michele had responded on behalf of their respective
   companies – perhaps other providers besides DBP can also step in here?)
   2. Does any provider offer its customer an option other than disclosure
   or publication, e.g. an opportunity to cancel the registration instead
   (i.e. what some WG members have mentioned as a “takedown”)?
   3. What are provider “standards" for determining disclosure to third
   parties?
   4. Can providers give the WG some general information about the
   percentage of requests for disclosure that are successful
   5. For Q4, do providers also have information about the type of claims
   those relate to e.g. If they are from LEA, 3P IP claim etc.?

As also noted on the call, the Chairs will discuss some of the responses
and suggestions that were made, with a view toward hopefully offering some
kind of summary or recommendation in time for the call next week.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org



_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing
list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140917/e28beaa5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DA6B8518-CC3A-4E38-BA72-9AB57AFDBD64[2].png
Type: image/png
Size: 8347 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140917/e28beaa5/DA6B8518-CC3A-4E38-BA72-9AB57AFDBD642.png>