[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Questions for P/P providers from the WG call earlier today
Chris Pelling
chris at netearth.net
Tue Sep 23 14:02:26 UTC 2014
Hi All,
Let me answer from our point of view and how we handle things :
1. Because we look at EACH and EVERY request manually if by ticket or
mail, all requests for disclosure are passed to the PP customer, we ask
the 2 parties requestee and pp customer to resolve whatever issue
between them, as this is the best way forward for all parties.
2. There is little point allowing a deletion of the domain, as it will
then simply be registered elsewhere. However, in point 1 getting the 2
parties talking and more to the point a resolution fixes the issue.
3. Case by Case basis - we do not host material for example, thus DMCA
as an example is simply passed on. If the issue is with the actual
domain name, then UDRP.
4. Well I can answer this one, in the last year we have had 2 requests
if memory serves and thus 2 disclosures.
5. As 4, only LEA. We would only disclose on LEA request (in our
jurisdiction) or Court order.
Kind regards,
Chris
NetEarth One, inc
On 16/09/2014 11:38 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
> Dear WG members,
>
> With the Chairs’ consent, I’m sending on the questions that were asked
> by several WG members during the call earlier today, in the hopes that
> those members who are or know of P/P providers and their practices can
> respond. If links to or copies of provider practices and policies can
> be provided, that would be very helpful too.
>
> 1. What are provider practices regarding customer notification when a
> disclosure request is received, and is the customer given the
> opportunity to respond? (Note - on the call, James had agreed to
> provide information about DBP; Graeme and Michele had responded on
> behalf of their respective companies – perhaps other providers
> besides DBP can also step in here?)
> 2. Does any provider offer its customer an option other than
> disclosure or publication, e.g. an opportunity to cancel the
> registration instead (i.e. what some WG members have mentioned as
> a “takedown”)?
> 3. What are provider “standards" for determining disclosure to third
> parties?
> 4. Can providers give the WG some general information about the
> percentage of requests for disclosure that are successful
> 5. For Q4, do providers also have information about the type of
> claims those relate to e.g. If they are from LEA, 3P IP claim etc.?
>
> As also noted on the call, the Chairs will discuss some of the
> responses and suggestions that were made, with a view toward hopefully
> offering some kind of summary or recommendation in time for the call
> next week.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140923/5be71dee/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list