[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Sample ccTLD request procedures (Re: PPSAI - Proposed language on attestation)

[Mary Wong]

Dear all,

Following on the last call, staff thought it might be helpful to compile a
sample of ccTLD procedures for dealing with third party requests for
registrant information and contact details (recognizing, of course, that
ccTLD policies differ in significant ways from those that apply to gTLDs).
Attached is a document summarizing the practices in .au, .be, .ca, .de,
.eu, .fr and .uk, based on information published by the respective central
registries on their websites.

We hope this is of some assistance in the WG¹s continuing discussions on
disclosure requests.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2015 at 09:59
To: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
Cc: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI - Proposed language on attestation

>The agency relationship effectively binds the parties to each other's
>representations.
>
>K
>
>Kiran Malancharuvil
>Internet Policy Counselor
>MarkMonitor
>415-419-9138 (m)
>
>Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
>
>On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Kathy Kleiman
><kathy at kathykleiman.com<mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>> wrote:
>
>"I have the authority to make the representations and claims in this
>request"
>is useful, but how does a consultant bind Procter & Gamble to the
>limitations on the use of the revealed data?
>
>Best,
>Kathy
>:
>Dear all:
>
>Following up on our productive discussion earlier this week, we¹d like to
>offer a suggestion to modify the ³attestation² provisions (II.A.6.c;
>II.B.7.d; and II.C.6.c) to require a statement by the requestor
>specifying his/her authority for making the request, or basis for agency
>if he or she is not the rights holder. For example: ³Where the signatory
>is not the rights holder, he/she must attest that he/she is an authorized
>representative of the rights holder, capable and qualified to evaluate
>and address the matters involved in this request, and having the
>authority to make the representations and claims on behalf of the rights
>holder in the request.²
>
>We could even spell out the statement for the signatory to make in
>conjunction with each request : ³I attest that I am the rights holder /
>authorized representative of the rights holder, capable and qualified to
>evaluate and address the matters involved in this request, and have the
>authority to make the representations and claims in this request.²
>
>These statements of authority and agency are to be made in good faith,
>under the penalty of perjury ­ just like representations forming the
>basis for the request and the requestor¹s promise to use the data
>disclosed only for limited enumerated purposes ­ and the falsity of these
>statements would be redressable by the method(s) we agree on.
>
>We believe this approach fairly balances the considerations expressed by
>various WG members and look forward to your thoughts.
>
>Best,
>Val
>
>
>
>Valeriya  
>Sherman<http://www.sgrlaw.com/attorneys/profiles/sherman-valeriya/> |
>Attorney at Law
>
>
>202-973-2611 phone
>202-263-4326 fax
>www.sgrlaw.com<http://www.sgrlaw.com>
>vsherman at sgrlaw.com<mailto:vsherman at sgrlaw.com>
>
>
>1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W.
>Suite 400
>Washington, D.C. 20007
>
>
>Ms. Sherman's practice is limited to matters before federal courts and
>before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
>She is not admitted in the District of Columbia.
>
>
><mime-attachment.jpg><http://www.sgrlaw.com> Smith, Gambrell & Russell,
>LLP
>
>________________________________
>Confidentiality Notice
>This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
>exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
>communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
>confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not
>the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy
>or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
>message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and
>delete all copies of the message.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Summary of Sample ccTLD Request Procedures.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 119269 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150403/73d6bce7/SummaryofSampleccTLDRequestProcedures-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150403/73d6bce7/smime-0001.p7s>