[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] New version of Disclosure Framework document and Annex

[Mary Wong]

Hi Kiran and everyone,

My apologies; it must have gotten dropped from the last version I was using,
so if that¹s where the group has settled in respect of the attestation
language for subsection (9), I will gladly put it back in. Thanks for
spotting the mistake!

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org



From:  Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>
Date:  Friday, April 17, 2015 at 15:31
To:  Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, PPSAI WG <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] New version of Disclosure Framework
document and Annex

> Hi Mary,
>  
> Thanks for circulating.
>  
> A quick question/concern about the ³attestation² language contained in
> II(B)(9).  I thought we reached a different place of compromise than what is
> represented in the current language.
>  
> Here¹s what the current document says:
>  
>             ³(9) Where the signatory is not the rights holder, an officer of
> the rights holder (if a corporate entity) or an attorney of the rights holder,
> the Provider may request, and the Requestor shall provide, sufficient proof of
> authorization.²  
>  
> Val Sherman originally proposed some language which further clarified when,
> and under what circumstances the Provider may request said authorization.
> That was edited by Kathy and the resulting language from Kathy was a great
> place to be in my opinion.  That looked something like this:
>  
> ³(9) Where the signatory is not the rights holder, an officer of the rights
> holder (if a corporate entity) or an attorney of the rights holder, and the
> Provider has a reasonable basis to believe that the Requestor is unauthorized
> to act on behalf of the rights holder or seeks to verify a new or unknown
> requestor, the Provider may request, and the Requestor shall provide,
> sufficient proof of authority.²
>  
> Since that language came from Kathy and represents a point of compromise, can
> we leave it in?  I¹m not sure I understand how it dropped in the first place.
> There doesn¹t seem to be any clash between this language and the desire of
> Providers to request information from requestors that they do not  know.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Best,
>  
> Kiran
>  
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> 415.222.8318 (t)
> 415.419.9138 (m)
> www.markmonitor.com <http://www.markmonitor.com/>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:10 PM
> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] New version of Disclosure Framework document and
> Annex
>  
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> As discussed on the WG call earlier this week and as reflected in the latest
> version of our Work Plan (attached), we are sending you the latest version of
> the Disclosure Framework document and associated Annex, in the hope that
> between now and our next call we can iron out the remaining points of
> difference or uncertainty, especially on Section III.C and the Annex. In these
> latest versions, we have accepted the changes up to and including those that
> were presented for WG discussion up to this past Tuesday (including on
> attestation); you will see that we have also done the following:
> * Moved up the automation language (with a slight tweak to the ³human review²
> phrasing to reflect the WG discussion of 7 April);
> * Retained the last version of the language in III.C(2) & (3) as well as added
> ­ as an alternative for discussion ­ Val¹s latest suggested language for the
> same;
> * Used Todd¹s latest suggestion (with a slight change to the pretext phrasing)
> in III.C(5); and
> * Tried to clarify the Annex in line with the WG discussion this week.
>  
> 
> Please use these latest documents in continuing the on-list discussions and in
> preparation for our next WG call on Tuesday.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks and cheers
> 
> Mary
> 
>  
> 
> Mary Wong
> 
> Senior Policy Director
> 
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> 
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150417/dd464c1e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150417/dd464c1e/smime-0001.p7s>