[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi All,
As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another 
change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the 
deletion of the words
"but not limited to" in the opening of III.C.  This was proposed by Val, 
not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would like 
to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"), in the 
draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard drafting 
language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so many 
supported today.

Best,
Kathy

III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent with 
the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to any of 
the following: ***