[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

[Carlton Samuels]

+1

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015, 10:34 AM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I would second this proposal.
> Stephanie
> On 15-04-21 11:07 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another
> > change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the
> > deletion of the words
> > "but not limited to" in the opening of III.C.  This was proposed by
> > Val, not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would
> > like to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"),
> > in the draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard
> > drafting language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so
> > many supported today.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kathy
> >
> > III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent
> > with the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to
> > any of the following: ***
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> > Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150421/1e01b862/attachment.html>