[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

[Mary Wong]

Hello everyone,

Just to confirm that this was indeed reinstated and is reflected as a
bracketed option in the 23 April draft Initial Report, as part of Annex E
(i.e. the illustrative disclosure framework).

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org



From:  Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
Date:  Monday, April 27, 2015 at 17:29
To:  Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Cc:  "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to
go back in too

> Agree with Kathy  and Stephanie on this
> 
> Holly
> On 28 Apr 2015, at 6:28 am, Stephanie Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
>> I would second this suggestion.
>> Stephanie Perrin
>> PS I am travelling and may experience some difficulties connecting on today's
>> call.
>> 
>> On 2015-04-22 4:56, Darcy Southwell wrote:
>>> I agree with Kathy.
>>> 
>>> I don¹t recall that we came to an agreement on this specific language
>>> removal (although I believe it was discussed at some point).  Without
>>> consensus, we should not remove the language at this point.
>>> 
>>> That aside, in order to create a sustainable  accreditation program, we
>>> should include the ³but not limited to² language to ensure that P/P
>>> providers can address concerns based in local law without being in violation
>>> of the accreditation agreement.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Darcy
>>> 
>>> From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 8:07 AM
>>> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go
>>> back in too
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another
>>> change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the
>>> deletion of the words
>>> "but not limited to" in the opening of III.C.  This was proposed by Val,
>>> not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would like
>>> to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"), in the
>>> draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard drafting
>>> language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so many
>>> supported today.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Kathy
>>> 
>>> III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent with
>>> the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to any of
>>> the following: ***
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-
>>> pdp-wg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150427/cfd4a55f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150427/cfd4a55f/smime-0001.p7s>