[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Revised Reveal Doc

[Kiran Malancharuvil]

Hi Kathy,

Thanks for forwarding this to the group, and special thanks for forwarding with enough time to review before the call!  

We can certainly discuss in more depth on the call tomorrow, but I am not a fan of the changes in Section II.  I'm concerned about the level of minutiae in the language, and I'm wondering how and why that level of micromanagement will be helpful/probative information to the Service Provider.  In very large companies, the trademark owner/president/VP/partner, etc. isn't actually involved directly in the enforcement activity.  It should be enough to demonstrate agency, as the previous language did.  

Perhaps I will have more later, but I wanted to float that to the group before the call.

Thanks,

Kiran

Kiran Malancharuvil
Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
415.222.8318 (t)
415.419.9138 (m)
www.markmonitor.com 



-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 11:19 AM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org; Metalitz, Steven; Graeme Bunton
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Revised Reveal Doc

Hi All,
Steve and I talked on Friday, and he asked me to circulate a Revised Reveal document -- which is attached.  This document has three types of changes based on our discussion last Tuesday and subsequent research:

1. To the title (reset pending further discussion) 2. To Section II, the Request Templates to clarify the requester and his/her direct knowledge of the alleged infringement and legal authority to represent the Requester, and 3. Annex (reset to original pending discussion with drafters over the narrow goals and intents of this section)

All other edits remain - to continue our excellent discussion of high standards for disclosure, human rights issues, etc. There is also much to discuss regarding follow-up processes (after the Request) including
a) when are appeals allowed and for whom, and b) how does a Provider challenge an alleged "wrongful disclosure" of its Customer's information?

Best and have a good rest of weekend,
Kathy