[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on 31 March

[Kathy Kleiman]

Tx Mary, much to discuss tomorrow.  In the meantime, would it be 
possible to get a full redline of the draft document from last week to 
this week -- both the inserts and the deletions?  I think there was a 
lot of text deleted and it would be go to be able to review it easily....

Tx!
Kathy

On 3/30/2015 1:28 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
> Thanks, Kathy – just to clarify that it wasn’t clear to us (staff) 
> that the list discussions resulted in agreement to change the type of 
> signatory, from someone who has to describe the “nature of his/her 
> authority to speak for the TM (or copyright) owner”, with two 
> illustrative examples (i.e. the authorization can be to a licensed 
> attorney or a corporate officer), to a more limited class consisting 
> either of the rights-holder, legal counsel or a corporate officer. It 
> seemed to us that questions still remained over issues such as parity 
> and the need to have the request originate from someone who has 
> performed a legal analysis of the alleged infringement. I apologize if 
> that is not the case, and am happy to change the draft as suggested 
> for the call tomorrow.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
>
> From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com 
> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:57
> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on 
> 31 March
>
>     Hi Mary and All,
>     I would like to point out that the discussion in Request Templates
>     has moved a past the current draft language in II.C.6. -- and the
>     current language still leaves room for someone to be a secretary,
>     clerk or computer. The language being proposed last week is/was 
>     "*authorized legal representative" -- meaning counsel or attorney
>     working for the company or as outside counsel. *It would of course
>     be appropriate, for those businesses too small to have counsel to
>     have the language (that is newly included), "*or corporate officer
>     with signing authority if trademark is owned by a legal entity."
>
>     **So the proposed language as we were discussing it last week
>     should be:**
>     *
>
>
>               *c) **       Signed by the trademark owner (where an
>               individual), the authorized legal representative and
>               counsel of the trademark owner **(e.g. licensed attorney
>               handling the alleged infringement), or corporate officer
>               with signing authority (if trademark is owned by a legal
>               entity).***
>
>     Ditto for the copyrights. Now we have someone we can trust to
>     submit the Reveal Request - and someone we can trust with the
>     personal and sensitive data when it is Revealed - a proper
>     authority for accountability!
>     Best,
>     Kathy
>
>     On 3/30/2015 10:45 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     The proposed agenda for our call on Tuesday 31 March is as follows:
>>
>>      1. Roll call/updates to SOI
>>      2. Discuss Annex to draft Disclosure framework document (see
>>         attachment)
>>      3. Discuss Section III.C of draft Disclosure framework document
>>         (see second attachment)
>>      4. Discuss remaining issues concerning draft Disclosure
>>         framework and Category F (if time permits)
>>      5. Next steps/next meeting
>>
>>     Please note that for ease of review, the Annex has been saved –
>>     and is being circulated as – a separate document. In this
>>     version, staff has attempted to rephrase (without changing the
>>     meaning or substance) of some of the language that appeared as
>>     shorter-form text in the original draft framework. We have also
>>     inserted two comments/questions for consideration by the WG.
>>
>>     Please note also that, in respect of the draft Disclosure
>>     framework document, this version accepts most of the changes
>>     discussed/proposed at the last few meeting, with the exception,
>>     mainly, of the following:
>>
>>       * _The details to be disclosed about the identity of the
>>         Requestor, including who can be a Signatory_: this version
>>         includes the recent changes from 16 & 22 March proposed by
>>         Kathy, with the exception that an option to replace the
>>         specific senior titles for a Signatory with the concept of an
>>         authorized corporate officer is offered.
>>       * _The grounds for refusal to disclose in III.C_: this version
>>         incorporates suggestions from the last WG call and adds the
>>         language suggested by Todd Williams to III.C.5.
>>
>>     Thanks and cheers
>>     Mary
>>
>>     Mary Wong
>>     Senior Policy Director
>>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>>     Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>>     Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150330/6d7bb039/attachment-0001.html>