[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on 31 March
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Mon Mar 30 18:11:31 UTC 2015
Hi Mary,
The full "tracked changes" version is very useful - tx you! Let me
share in case others want the full color and comparison experience...
Best,
Kathy
On 3/30/2015 2:02 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
> Hi Kathy, sure thing – I’ve sent it to you separately as it’s now a
> pretty huge and colorful document, so the chairs had thought it might
> be more helpful for the WG to have a somewhat cleaner version on hand
> for this week. If what I just sent to you looks a bit too psychedelic
> as a result, it may be easier to view the changes by doing a direct
> comparison between the document sent out for the call last week and
> the latest version sent out earlier today (though that may depend on
> your computer settings and programs).
>
> If other WG members would also like a copy of the full “tracked
> changes" version, please let me know.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
>
> From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com
> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 13:34
> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on
> 31 March
>
> Tx Mary, much to discuss tomorrow. In the meantime, would it be
> possible to get a full redline of the draft document from last
> week to this week -- both the inserts and the deletions? I think
> there was a lot of text deleted and it would be go to be able to
> review it easily....
>
> Tx!
> Kathy
>
> On 3/30/2015 1:28 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>> Thanks, Kathy – just to clarify that it wasn’t clear to us
>> (staff) that the list discussions resulted in agreement to change
>> the type of signatory, from someone who has to describe the
>> “nature of his/her authority to speak for the TM (or copyright)
>> owner”, with two illustrative examples (i.e. the authorization
>> can be to a licensed attorney or a corporate officer), to a more
>> limited class consisting either of the rights-holder, legal
>> counsel or a corporate officer. It seemed to us that questions
>> still remained over issues such as parity and the need to have
>> the request originate from someone who has performed a legal
>> analysis of the alleged infringement. I apologize if that is not
>> the case, and am happy to change the draft as suggested for the
>> call tomorrow.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mary
>>
>> Mary Wong
>> Senior Policy Director
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>
>>
>> From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com
>> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
>> Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:57
>> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call
>> on 31 March
>>
>> Hi Mary and All,
>> I would like to point out that the discussion in Request
>> Templates has moved a past the current draft language in
>> II.C.6. -- and the current language still leaves room for
>> someone to be a secretary, clerk or computer. The language
>> being proposed last week is/was "*authorized legal
>> representative" -- meaning counsel or attorney working for
>> the company or as outside counsel. *It would of course be
>> appropriate, for those businesses too small to have counsel
>> to have the language (that is newly included), "*or corporate
>> officer with signing authority if trademark is owned by a
>> legal entity."
>>
>> **So the proposed language as we were discussing it last week
>> should be:**
>> *
>>
>>
>> *c) ** Signed by the trademark owner (where
>> an individual), the authorized legal representative
>> and counsel of the trademark owner **(e.g. licensed
>> attorney handling the alleged infringement), or
>> corporate officer with signing authority (if
>> trademark is owned by a legal entity).***
>>
>> Ditto for the copyrights. Now we have someone we can trust to
>> submit the Reveal Request - and someone we can trust with the
>> personal and sensitive data when it is Revealed - a proper
>> authority for accountability!
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>>
>> On 3/30/2015 10:45 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> The proposed agenda for our call on Tuesday 31 March is as
>>> follows:
>>>
>>> 1. Roll call/updates to SOI
>>> 2. Discuss Annex to draft Disclosure framework document
>>> (see attachment)
>>> 3. Discuss Section III.C of draft Disclosure framework
>>> document (see second attachment)
>>> 4. Discuss remaining issues concerning draft Disclosure
>>> framework and Category F (if time permits)
>>> 5. Next steps/next meeting
>>>
>>> Please note that for ease of review, the Annex has been
>>> saved – and is being circulated as – a separate document. In
>>> this version, staff has attempted to rephrase (without
>>> changing the meaning or substance) of some of the language
>>> that appeared as shorter-form text in the original draft
>>> framework. We have also inserted two comments/questions for
>>> consideration by the WG.
>>>
>>> Please note also that, in respect of the draft Disclosure
>>> framework document, this version accepts most of the changes
>>> discussed/proposed at the last few meeting, with the
>>> exception, mainly, of the following:
>>>
>>> * _The details to be disclosed about the identity of the
>>> Requestor, including who can be a Signatory_: this
>>> version includes the recent changes from 16 & 22 March
>>> proposed by Kathy, with the exception that an option to
>>> replace the specific senior titles for a Signatory with
>>> the concept of an authorized corporate officer is offered.
>>> * _The grounds for refusal to disclose in III.C_: this
>>> version incorporates suggestions from the last WG call
>>> and adds the language suggested by Todd Williams to
>>> III.C.5.
>>>
>>> Thanks and cheers
>>> Mary
>>>
>>> Mary Wong
>>> Senior Policy Director
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150330/bcd9b351/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft Disclosure Text - full track changes version - updated 30 Mar 2015 - REDLINE.docx (00773977xB3D1E).DOCX
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 48284 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150330/bcd9b351/DraftDisclosureText-fulltrackchangesversion-updated30Mar2015-REDLINE.docx00773977xB3D1E-0001.DOCX>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list