[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for review on 3 November 2015

[James M. Bladel]

Thanks Mary.

If time permits and our agenda allows for AOB, I'd like to revisit the discussion of the Implementation issues raised in Dublin.  As our Final Report & Recommendations start to take shape, I believe we should ask Staff (GDD, Compliance, etc.) to assess the implementation considerations for each recommendation, and (where applicable) offer alternatives using existing models & services (RAA, Data Escrow, TMCH, etc.).

I realize we may not be there yet, but IMO this is an essential component of our work that cannot just be handed over to an Implementation Review Team.  For comparison, the IRT for transfer working groups have spent over 1.5 years discussing changes that are fairly minor compared to PPSAI, so we should take every opportunity to get out in front of this work.

Happy to discuss further on our call

Thanks-

J.





From: <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
Date: Monday, November 2, 2015 at 16:12
To: PPSAI WG <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for review on 3 November 2015

Dear WG members,

The agenda for our next meeting, on Tuesday 3 November, is as follows. PLEASE NOTE THE UTC TIME CHANGE due to daylight savings time in a number of countries - the call will be at 1500 UTC (07:00 PST, 10:00 EST, 15:00 London, 16:00 CET).

  1.  Roll call/updates to SOI
  2.  Continued discussion of Illustrative Disclosure Framework (latest version attached - please also see the note below)
  3.  Discussion of proposed revised text for de-accreditation (see attached draft text) and possible data escrow recommendation
  4.  Next steps

For agenda item #2, please note that the draft being circulated is still under discussion by Sub Team 3 and is subject to further revision and recommendations by the group. As such, the "redlined" edits that were presented during the Dublin F2F meeting have been retained rather than "accepted" as changes. For your easier review, please note that the main changes since Dublin that incorporate the WG's discussion points and agreement in Dublin include: (1) clarification in Section III.A regarding an exception to disclosure in cases where personal safety is endangered; and (2) an addition to Section III.C (as sub-section (vii)) to clarify that providers will not need to disclose if the verifiable evidence spelled out in Section II is not fully produced by the requester.

In addition, this current draft includes new language on dispute resolution (see, e.g., Section II.A(6)(c)). The new language was inserted to cover what has been termed "Option 2" in the annex, concerning dispute resolution in the event of disclosure due to improper requests. The Sub Team acknowledges that while this topic was discussed briefly in Dublin, there was no WG agreement on a specific recommendation. The new language in the current draft document - as well as specific edits to the "annex" containing Options One and Two - reflects a suggestion by some Sub Team members to adopt Option Two. This suggestion, which may not reflect the view of all Sub Team members as it is still being discussed, is nevertheless being presented to the full WG for further consideration.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20151103/d95343fe/attachment.html>