[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Final Report with updated recommendations, and next steps

Luc SEUFER lseufer at dclgroup.eu
Mon Nov 30 18:53:21 UTC 2015 

I too agree with Darcy’s proposed modification.

For my part, I would hope we could modify II. 4 on page 9 to make it clear that on top of being feasible, the labelling in the WHOIS  also implies  knowledge of the registrar of record. Written as it is it reads to me as if the only condition for the labelling is its technical feasibility.

Also point 14 on page 13 assimilate the designated point of contact for a P/P service provider to the TEAC. This point of contact under the policy on transfers is supposed to reply within 4 hours from the sending of a message. Imposing such tremendous obligation on P/P service providers part seems inappropriate.

The 4th bullet point of point 17 on page 15 doesn’t seem to allow for a third party (the registrar) to perform the email address verification. In cas where the P/P service provider is also affiliated to a registrar I don’t think it will be the P/P service provider who will perform the verification.

Regarding 1.3.2 on page 19, would it be too bold to  also recommend that this accreditation shall not be subject to an ICANN accreditation fee?

All the best,

Luc



On 30 Nov 2015, at 18:31, Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>> wrote:

That sounds reasonable. The notice period could be seen as similar to the suspension period for registrars currently in place where a registrar is no langer able to accept new registrations or transfers, but can still serve its existing customers.

I support the suggested change of moving the notice out of the breach notice period.

Volker


Am 30.11.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Darcy Southwell:
All,

I have some concerns about the language contained in Principle 1 on page 17.  It’s certainly important the WG’s recommendations focus on minimizing any risks of exposing private customer data during the de-accreditation process.  However, notifying customers “during the breach notice process (or its equivalent)” seems problematic.  This assumes every P/P provider that receives a breach notice will end up de-accredited.  That’s clearly not the case in the current registrar breach process, and it’s unlikely to be case with the P/P providers.   Second, there could be significant negative impact to businesses that receive just one breach notice even though the breach ends up cured.  The focus of the breach process should not be to penalize every provider that’s ever done something in violation of the accreditation contract – and that’s what this approach implies.

It seems the better approach would be to notify customers somewhere between the date of the termination notice and the effective date of the accreditation termination.   If we consider a 30–day period between the termination notice and termination effective date, there is ample time to notify customers.

Look forward to tomorrow’s meeting.

Thanks,
Darcy

From: <<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of "Metalitz, Steven" <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>>
Date: Monday, November 23, 2015 at 1:33 PM
To: 'Mary Wong' <<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Final Report with updated recommendations, and next steps

Thanks to Mary and her colleagues for generating this final report text.
As noted on last week’s call, unless it seemed necessary to hold our usual weekly meeting this week (tomorrow), we would cancel it, in order to give WG members time to review this text carefully.  The call tomorrow has now been cancelled, and we urge you to use this week for this review, and for consultation with the relevant GNSO stakeholder group/constituency, or with ALAC groups, as appropriate.
The goal of the review and consultation is to identify any mistakes or ambiguities in this text that would interfere with your ability to respond to the consensus call.  We urge WG members to bring any such issues up on the WG list as soon as possible, which will help us in fashioning a productive agenda for the next WG call on Tuesday December 1.  We have allocated 90 minutes for this call (beginning at 1430 UTC) to provide additional time to discuss and resolve any errors or ambiguities identified.  We anticipate that this will be the final WG call before the close of the consensus call on Monday, December 7.   All expressions of support for the recommendations of the Final Report, as well as any separate statements regarding recommendations that you cannot support, will be due at that time.  Thanks to all for your continued efforts as we bring this report across the finish line!

Steve Metalitz and Graeme Bunton


From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:39 PM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Final Report with updated recommendations, and next steps

Dear WG members,

Please find attached both a clean and marked-up (red-lined) version of the updated draft Final Report. As the marked-up version may be somewhat difficult to read given the number of paragraphs moved around, added to or deleted, we hope the clean version will be helpful in providing a straightforward read of the proposed final form of the WG recommendations while the mark-up will show where the changes were made from the draft report that was circulated on 8 October.

As noted in the WG Work Plan, circulation of this updated document opens the period for the WG’s consensus call. Following this, in accordance with the GNSO's WG Guidelines, the WG co-chairs will make a final evaluation of the consensus support levels and, if necessary, assign specific designations of such to each individual WG recommendation. Any minority statements must therefore also be submitted by that time. As noted in the WG Work Plan, the co-chairs plan to close the consensus call period by Monday 7 December 2015. Unless determined otherwise as a result of this consensus period, the recommendations are currently marked as Full Consensus of the WG.

For your convenience, the main changes that were made to the draft report include the following:

  *   All the substantive changes can be seen in the Executive Summary, which retain the format and numbering of the recommendations from the earlier draft. Most of the additional WG conclusions based on discussions subsequent to 8 October were added to existing numbered recommendations. The relevant portions of Section V (WG Deliberations) and VII (WG Final Recommendations) have also been updated to reflect the substantive changes to the numbered WG recommendations in the Executive Summary. Most of the rest of the report, and much of even Sections  and VII, remain unchanged from both the Initial Report (May 2015) and the draft Final Report.
  *   The final version of the Illustrative Disclosure Framework reflecting the consensus of Sub Team 3 has been incorporated into the report as Annex B. Please note that the final recommendation includes only one option for dispute resolution, which is jurisdiction over arbitration, in language discussed by the WG and finalized by the Sub Team. There is also a recommendation for a post-implementation review of the overall framework, followed by periodic reviews thereafter.
  *   On transfers, you will see from the recommendations that language has been added, in particular to #8 and #21. The former makes reference to the effect of IRTP-C, and the latter – in relation to de-accreditation – adds a specific recommendation to the effect that a registrar must lift the otherwise-required lock under IRTP-C if so requested by the beneficial user of a proxy registration. This recommendation is based on the narrower option presented by the Registrar Services team to the WG following the WG call earlier this week. We have also retained the original WG recommendation that the next review of the IRTP expressly include consideration of the effect on P/P registrations.
  *   On de-accreditation, we have replaced the original specific individual recommendations with the new set of three general principles recently reviewed by the WG.
  *   On definitions, we have included those for a Privacy Service and a Proxy Service in the list of definitions, and added the most recent version of the new, supplemental language about registrars not knowingly accepting registrations from accredited (versus unaccredited) P/P service providers, and the consequence that an unaccredited provider effectively therefore has all the responsibility of a Registered Name Holder.
  *   On LEA, we have added language to reflect the WG’s further agreement in Dublin about “importing” a few critical elements from the Illustrative Disclosure Framework into a suggestion that these be included in any future LEA request framework that may be developed.
  *   In the general recommendation section, we have added recommendations based on the work of Sub Team 3, as discussed by the WG in Dublin, for an educational/outreach program and for the periodic provision of aggregated statistics to ICANN by providers.
  *   Elsewhere, we have added or edited language, again based on the WG’s discussions in Dublin and subsequently, to flesh out or clarify existing recommendations. Most of these are indicated with a comment box explaining where the change came from.

Thanks to everyone, especially our co-chairs and the various Sub-Teams, for facilitating our progress toward a Final Report!

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>



_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg


_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg


--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>

Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>
www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>

Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>
www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.





_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg


________________________________

--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------

More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list