[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
Volker Greimann
vgreimann at key-systems.net
Tue Sep 22 08:00:07 UTC 2015
I would also like to remind the working group that the majority view
includes registrars, registries and user groups representing millions of
domain owners and internet users.
Minorities are free to publish a minority statement to the report, I
though that was what this instrument was there for.
Volker
Am 21.09.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Kiran Malancharuvil:
>
> Agree with Vicky. I would also remind the working group that the
> “minority” view calling for more work includes membership
> organizations representing thousands of voices including INTA, IACC,
> IPC, BC, US Chamber of Commerce).
>
> While I’m weighing in I would also reject any association of these
> groups with discriminatory viewpoints such as that people of color are
> 2/3rds of a human being (from the notorious and despicable Dred Scott
> decision). Slightly hyperbolic Carlton.
>
> Kiran
>
> *Kiran Malancharuvil*
>
> Policy Counselor
>
> MarkMonitor
>
> 415.222.8318 (t)
>
> 415.419.9138 (m)
>
> www.markmonitor.com <http://www.markmonitor.com/>
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 10:01 AM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to update
> Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> Forwarding on behalf of Vicky Sheckler.
>
> *From:*Victoria Sheckler
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 9:22 AM
> *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
> update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> Doesn’t that approach unfairly ignore the comments that requested
> the minority position? It seems to me that the last paragraph is
> consistent with the majority view but permits time to assess the
> concerns raised by the minority view.
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kathy
> Kleiman
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 8:58 AM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
> update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> +1 James G, Michele, Phil and Holly. This report is stunningly
> unsupported by the consensus of the WG. It is a complete
> nonstarter. It further undermines confidence in this PDP process.
>
> Kathy
>
>
> On 9/19/2015 9:56 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>
> I totally agree with James G, Michele, and Phil. The last two
> paragraphs seem to fly in the face of the rest of the text.
> We could not reach consensus on the definitions, let alone
> the boundaries of what might be excluded from use of the P/P
> service. I do not understand why we are contemplating any
> further work on the issue. The overwhelming majority of
> comments did not support it. the WG does not support it. In
> Phil’s words, surely the horse is well and truly dead and the
> only appropriate action now is a respectful burial.
>
> Holly
>
> On 19 Sep 2015, at 9:21 am, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com
> <mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
>
> +1. While I was unable to make the last call those final
> two paragraphs seem out of sync with the long description
> of why there is no consensus on circumscribing the use of
> P/P services forcommercial or transactional services.
>
> Further, as regards this paragraph—
>
> The Working Group also considered the suggestion
> that*during the implementation phase*of the accreditation
> system, priority be given to the development of an
> illustrative framework mechanism for how complaints that a
> particular domain name is being used to carry out online
> financial transactions for commercial purposes should be
> submitted, processed, evaluated, and acted upon. Concerns
> that a blanket prohibition against the use of P/P services
> associated with a domain name used to carry out online
> financial transactions for commercial purposes would have
> a chilling effect could be adequately addressed by
> developing an additional disclosure framework. Requests
> for further legal analysis of when disclosure is warranted
> in these situations could find its home here*. This could
> be an appropriate use of implementation
> resources.*(emphasis added)
>
> **
>
> *--*if there is no consensus on**the definitions of
> “online financial transactions for commercial purposes” or
> on placing any restrictions on them, then how could
> developing an “Illustrative framework mechanism” possibly
> be considered an appropriate implementation measure? There
> is no underlying policy to be implemented. Seems more like
> an attempt to beat a dead horse back to life.
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172/cell*
>
> **
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
> */"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey/*
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>[mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org]*On
> Behalf Of*Michele Neylon - Blacknight
> *Sent:*Friday, September 18, 2015 5:45 PM
> *To:*James Gannon; Mary Wong;gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:*Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language
> to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> I agree strongly with James G’s assessment.
>
> If we agree that there should be no “special” restriction
> for commercial / financial usage of domains, then why on
> earth is this language there? I don’t understand it.
>
> Regards
>
> Michele
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> http://www.blacknight.host/
>
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
>
> http://www.blacknight.press- get our latest news & media
> coverage
>
> http://www.technology.ie
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Social:http://mneylon.social
>
> Random Stuff:http://www.michele.irish
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside
> Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>
> *From:*<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of
> James Gannon
> *Date:*Friday 18 September 2015 20:34
> *To:*Mary Wong, "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
> *Subject:*Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language
> to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> Thanks for your work on this guys, while understanding
> that we will be discussing this on the call I will
> raise now my disagreement with the final two
> paragraphs on creating an alternative disclosure
> framework at some point in the future for commercial
> domains, I don’t feel these represent the consensus or
> agreement of the WG and would respectfully object
> against their inclusion. I was under the impression
> that we had agreed that the public had shown their
> overall disagreement with a framework that included
> categorisation of domains, my read of the final 2
> paras seems to fly in the face of that agreement.
>
> -James
>
> *From:*<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on
> behalf of Mary Wong
> *Date:*Friday 18 September 2015 20:21
> *To:*"gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
> *Subject:*[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language
> to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
> Dear WG members,
>
> Please find attached some proposed language from the
> WG co-chairs in respect of Section 1.3.3 of the WG’s
> Initial Report, i.e. the availability and use of P/P
> services for domain names associated with online
> financial transactions. The suggested language is
> based on the reports from Sub Team 2 and the WG’s
> deliberations on this point following review of the
> various public comments received.
>
> The co-chairs would like to include a discussion of
> this proposed language on the next WG call, and as
> such we are circulating it to you now so that you will
> have a chance to review it before then. If finalized
> and approved, this will be included in the WG’s Final
> Report on this topic.
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Senior Policy Director
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
>
> Email:mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2015.0.6081 / Virus Database: 4401/10465 -
> Release Date: 08/19/15
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150922/ec10ddbc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list