[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report

Volker Greimann vgreimann at key-systems.net
Tue Sep 22 08:05:14 UTC 2015


+1

Am 21.09.2015 um 23:52 schrieb Carlton Samuels:
> Actually sir, what undermines the PDP process is an attempt to back 
> door an idea that was explicitly rejected.
>
> Because absent this attempt I would have kept my peace. And my use of 
> metaphoric language - which you clearly don't like! -  would not have 
> been provoked.
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> /Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
> =============================
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Kiran Malancharuvil 
> <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com 
> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>> wrote:
>
>     This is the attitude that truly undermines the PDP process.
>
>     Kiran
>
>     *From:*Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com
>     <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com>]
>     *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 2:35 PM
>     *To:* Terri Stumme
>     *Cc:* Kiran Malancharuvil; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>
>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
>     update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>     Happy to see Kiran recognized the reference, even why I would be
>     suspicious of anyone else defining my commercial activity.
>
>     Yessir, the language was deliberately chosen.  And for effect.
>
>     Unhappily, the response tends to the regular. It is always the
>     victim that is encouraged to wait and be of good cheer. After the
>     hurt.
>
>     It should therefore not surprise that I would reject that argument.
>
>     -Carlton
>
>
>
>     ==============================
>     Carlton A Samuels
>     Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799>
>     /Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
>     =============================
>
>     On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Terri Stumme
>     <terri.stumme at legitscript.com
>     <mailto:terri.stumme at legitscript.com>> wrote:
>
>     Additionally, as noted in the attached "Issue Chart for the GNSO
>     RAA Remaining Issues PDP on Privacy/Proxy Services", Item 6.2,
>     this issue was originally brought forth by law enforcement.
>
>     On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Kiran Malancharuvil
>     <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com
>     <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>> wrote:
>
>     Agree with Vicky.  I would also remind the working group that the
>     “minority” view calling for more work includes membership
>     organizations representing thousands of voices including INTA,
>     IACC, IPC, BC, US Chamber of Commerce).
>
>     While I’m weighing in I would also reject any association of these
>     groups with discriminatory viewpoints such as that people of color
>     are 2/3rds of a human being (from the notorious and despicable
>     Dred Scott decision). Slightly hyperbolic Carlton.
>
>     Kiran
>
>     *Kiran Malancharuvil*
>
>     Policy Counselor
>
>     MarkMonitor
>
>     415.222.8318 <tel:415.222.8318> (t)
>
>     415.419.9138 <tel:415.419.9138> (m)
>
>     www.markmonitor.com <http://www.markmonitor.com/>
>
>     *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong
>     *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 10:01 AM
>
>
>     *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
>     update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>     Forwarding on behalf of Vicky Sheckler.
>
>         *From:*Victoria Sheckler
>         *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 9:22 AM
>         *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>         <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>         *Subject:* RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
>         update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>         Doesn’t that approach unfairly ignore the comments that
>         requested the minority position? It seems to me that the last
>         paragraph is consistent with the majority view but permits
>         time to assess the concerns raised by the minority view.
>
>         *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>         <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
>         [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of
>         *Kathy Kleiman
>         *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 8:58 AM
>         *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>         <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>         *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft language to
>         update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>         +1 James G, Michele, Phil and Holly. This report is stunningly
>         unsupported by the consensus of the WG. It is a complete
>         nonstarter.  It further undermines confidence in this PDP
>         process.
>
>         Kathy
>
>         On 9/19/2015 9:56 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>
>             I totally agree with James G, Michele, and Phil.  The last
>             two paragraphs seem to fly in the face of the rest of the
>             text.  We could not reach consensus on the definitions,
>             let alone the boundaries of what might be excluded from
>             use of the P/P service.  I do not understand why we are
>             contemplating any further work on the issue.  The
>             overwhelming majority of comments did not support it.  the
>             WG does not support it. In Phil’s words, surely the horse
>             is well and truly dead and the only appropriate action now
>             is a respectful burial.
>
>             Holly
>
>             On 19 Sep 2015, at 9:21 am, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com
>             <mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
>
>                 +1. While I was unable to make the last call those
>                 final two paragraphs seem out of sync with the long
>                 description of why there is no consensus on
>                 circumscribing the use of P/P services forcommercial
>                 or transactional services.
>
>                 Further, as regards this paragraph—
>
>                 The Working Group also considered the suggestion
>                 that*during the implementation phase* of the
>                 accreditation system, priority be given to the
>                 development of an illustrative framework mechanism for
>                 how complaints that a particular domain name is being
>                 used to carry out online financial transactions for
>                 commercial purposes should be submitted, processed,
>                 evaluated, and acted upon. Concerns that a blanket
>                 prohibition against the use of P/P services associated
>                 with a domain name used to carry out online financial
>                 transactions for commercial purposes would have a
>                 chilling effect could be adequately addressed by
>                 developing an additional disclosure framework.
>                 Requests for further legal analysis of when disclosure
>                 is warranted in these situations could find its home
>                 here*. This could be an appropriate use of
>                 implementation resources. *(emphasis added)
>
>                 **
>
>                 *-- *if there is no consensus on**the definitions of
>                 “online financial transactions for commercial
>                 purposes” or on placing any restrictions on them, then
>                 how could developing an “Illustrative framework
>                 mechanism” possibly be considered an appropriate
>                 implementation measure? There is no underlying policy
>                 to be implemented. Seems more like an attempt to beat
>                 a dead horse back to life.
>
>                 *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
>                 *Virtualaw LLC*
>
>                 *1155 F Street, NW*
>
>                 *Suite 1050*
>
>                 *Washington, DC 20004*
>
>                 *202-559-8597 <tel:202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
>                 *202-559-8750 <tel:202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
>                 *202-255-6172 <tel:202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>                 **
>
>                 *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>                 */"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey/*
>
>                 *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>                 <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org]
>                 *On Behalf Of *Michele Neylon - Blacknight
>                 *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2015 5:45 PM
>                 *To:* James Gannon; Mary Wong;
>                 gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>                 <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>                 *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft
>                 language to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>                 I agree strongly with James G’s assessment.
>
>                 If we agree that there should be no “special”
>                 restriction for commercial / financial usage of
>                 domains, then why on earth is this language there? I
>                 don’t understand it.
>
>                 Regards
>
>                 Michele
>
>                 --
>
>                 Mr Michele Neylon
>
>                 Blacknight Solutions
>
>                 Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
>                 http://www.blacknight.host/
>
>                 http://blog.blacknight.com/
>
>                 http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news &
>                 media coverage
>
>                 http://www.technology.ie
>
>                 Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>                 <tel:%2B353%20%280%29%2059%20%C2%A09183072>
>
>                 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>                 <tel:%2B353%20%280%2959%209183090>
>
>                 Social: http://mneylon.social
>
>                 Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish
>
>                 -------------------------------
>
>                 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside
>                 Business Park,Sleaty
>
>                 Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>                 *From: *<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>                 <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on
>                 behalf of James Gannon
>                 *Date: *Friday 18 September 2015 20:34
>                 *To: *Mary Wong, "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>                 <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>                 *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft
>                 language to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report
>
>                     Thanks for your work on this guys, while
>                     understanding that we will be discussing this on
>                     the call I will raise now my disagreement with the
>                     final two paragraphs on creating an alternative
>                     disclosure framework at some point in the future
>                     for commercial domains, I don’t feel these
>                     represent the consensus or agreement of the WG and
>                     would respectfully object against their inclusion.
>                     I was under the impression that we had agreed that
>                     the public had shown their overall disagreement
>                     with a framework that included categorisation of
>                     domains, my read of the final 2 paras seems to fly
>                     in the face of that agreement.
>
>                     -James
>
>                     *From: *<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>                     <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on
>                     behalf of Mary Wong
>                     *Date: *Friday 18 September 2015 20:21
>                     *To: *"gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>                     <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>                     *Subject: *[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed draft
>                     language to update Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial
>                     Report
>
>                     Dear WG members,
>
>                     Please find attached some proposed language from
>                     the WG co-chairs in respect of Section 1.3.3 of
>                     the WG’s Initial Report, i.e. the availability and
>                     use of P/P services for domain names associated
>                     with online financial transactions. The suggested
>                     language is based on the reports from Sub Team 2
>                     and the WG’s deliberations on this point following
>                     review of the various public comments received.
>
>                     The co-chairs would like to include a discussion
>                     of this proposed language on the next WG call, and
>                     as such we are circulating it to you now so that
>                     you will have a chance to review it before then.
>                     If finalized and approved, this will be included
>                     in the WG’s Final Report on this topic.
>
>                     Thanks and cheers
>
>                     Mary
>
>                     Mary Wong
>
>                     Senior Policy Director
>
>                     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
>                     (ICANN)
>
>                     Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
>                     <tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889>
>
>                     Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>                     <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 No virus found in this message.
>                 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>                 Version: 2015.0.6081 / Virus Database: 4401/10465 -
>                 Release Date: 08/19/15
>                 Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>                 Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>                 <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>                 https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>
>             Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>
>             Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>             <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     /Terri Stumme/
>
>     /Intelligence Analyst/
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>     Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150922/4ff5d7ee/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list