[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction

[Chris Pelling]

But remember it was encoded first ;) So falling into enemy hands would not have helped. 

Now you could argue the time it might take the complainer to decipher the code could be construed as being outside of the "within a timely manner" - but the wording, at least the way I read it does not require us to provide a cipher though, so... 

Kind regards, 

Chris 


From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com> 
To: "John Horton" <john.horton at legitscript.com>, "James Gannon" <james at cyberinvasion.net> 
Cc: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 18:09:49 
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction 

No idea of the context, but here’s a great story about the skeleton of a carrier pigeon (message still attached) found during restoration of a home in Surrey. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2226203/Skeleton-hero-World-War-II-carrier-pigeon-chimney-secret-coded-message-attached-leg.html 

Looks like I picked the wrong week to miss a PPSAI call. 

J. 


From: < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org > on behalf of John Horton < john.horton at legitscript.com > 
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 11:09 
To: James Gannon < james at cyberinvasion.net > 
Cc: PPSAI WG < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org > 
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction 

Are we going to allow these pigeons to remain anonymous? Shouldn't we require them to disclose their identities -- particularly if they are selling communication services to the public? 

As you all surely know, a lot of them are just fly-by-night businesses. 

John Horton 
President and CEO, LegitScript 






Follow Legit Script : LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Blog | Google+ 

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:04 AM, James Gannon < james at cyberinvasion.net > wrote: 



I’m happy to consider RFC1149 https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt for our purposes here, however even carrier pidgeons recommend encryption 


BQ_BEGIN

Security Considerations

   Security is not generally a problem in normal operation, but special
   measures must be taken (such as data encryption) when avian carriers
   are used in a tactical environment 




Always willing to come to a compromise =) 

-James Gannon 
From: < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org > on behalf of "Don M. Blumenthal" 
Date: Tuesday 29 September 2015 16:24 
To: PPSAI 
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction 



For this morning’s callers. Passenger pigeons are extinct. Carrier pigeon still is a viable option. 



I originally wrote that carrier pigeons still are on the table. I’m glad that I reread. 

_______________________________________________ 
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list 
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg 

BQ_END



_______________________________________________ 
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list 
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150929/91c3e1ca/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CFFF89B3-BF80-4605-B46A-725B0D20E6A4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 245414 bytes
Desc: CFFF89B3-BF80-4605-B46A-725B0D20E6A4.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150929/91c3e1ca/CFFF89B3-BF80-4605-B46A-725B0D20E6A4-0001.png>