[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PP transfer issue

[gtheo]

Thanks Amy,

I favor option two in this case. Option 1 will just put a burden on 
Registrants for no good reason.

Best regards,

Theo Geurts

Amy Bivins schreef op 2015-11-17 07:01 PM:
> Dear PPSAI WG Members:
> 
> Here is the issue you asked staff to address by email today.  This
> came to our attention after reflecting on the work done Friday by the
> "implementation issues" sub-team.
> 
> In short, disabling a proxy or privacy service will trigger the 60-day
> inter-registrar transfer lock required by IRTP C (which takes effect
> on 1 August 2016,
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transfer-policy-2015-09-24-en ).
> Although applicable generally, this issue is of particular concern
> following de-accreditation of a privacy or proxy service (if transfer
> to another registrar is required to maintain privacy).
> 
> Here are 3 things the WG could consider doing to address this:
> 
> 1. Maintain the status quo and leave the 60-day IRTP C lock in place.
> 2. Create an exception for Privacy and Proxy Service customers, so the
> 60 day IRTP C (inter-registrar transfer) lock doesn't apply when/if
> the customer changes or removes the PP service.
> 3. Create an exception for PP users only if a PP service is
> de-accredited, so the IRTP C (inter-registrar transfer) lock can be
> lifted by the beneficial user if the registrar has been notified of
> de-accreditation.
> 
> Please let us know if you'd like to us to provide any further
> background.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> AMY E. BIVINS
> 
> Registrar Policy Services Manager
> 
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> 
> amy.bivins at icann.org
> 
> __
> 
> _ONE WORLD. ONE INTERNET._
> 
> Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
> 
> Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104
> 
> 801 17th Street NW, Suite 400
> 
> Washington, DC 20006
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg