[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
Amy Bivins
amy.bivins at icann.org
Mon Nov 28 19:16:54 UTC 2016
Hi Steve,
Thanks for flagging this and passing along these documents. This topic is on
the agenda for tomorrow (albeit more generally, under discussion topic
2-subgroups). We can re-arrange and discuss this first if the IRT would
prefer that.
In short (this is my personal view, not an official staff position), this
would be an additional item to add to the work plan. The Final
Recommendations on privacy/proxy called for a "compatibility check" with the
Transfer Policy, but this appears to be broader than that. We could
potentially mitigate the impact by using a subgroup to work on this topic in
parallel to the IRT's other work (meeting on weeks where there is not an IRT
meeting) with the hope that volunteers with experience and interest in this
topic (and in the Transfer Policy PDP/IRT) will sign up to work with staff
to develop a solution that can be brought back to the broader IRT.
Best,
Amy
From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met at msk.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 1:49 PM
To: Amy Bivins <amy.bivins at icann.org>; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: RE: Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
Amy and colleagues,
Does staff have a view on how the timetable and work plan of this IRT would
change if the pending motion before the GNSO Council (attached) were adopted
and those aspects of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C as they
impact registrar-operated p/p services were "placed for evaluation and
recommendation" by this IRT, in addition to its other responsibilities?
Could this issue be added to tomorrow's agenda please?
Thanks.
Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation
T: 202.355.7902 | <mailto:met at msk.com> met at msk.com
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP |
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.msk.com_&d=DgMF-g&c
=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-TplkjKTey9bgt
dWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=GVFgP12d92WYhc6jmZq6-bDevNhQ4dqcRtgrTY2zaCo&s=oYgFnpm6Lq4V9
WSyjCq7v8lMV4MLhAv1JKnIpcupuFE&e=> www.msk.com[msk.com]
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT,
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR
COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY
BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL
ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
[mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:07 PM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
Hi, All,
I hope you are well!
Our next Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation Program IRT call
is scheduled for 29 November 2016, 14:00 UTC. I apologize, I misspoke in our
last meeting about what time this meeting is in the U.S. (I said 10 Eastern,
but that was before the time change. It is now 9 Eastern). We'll discuss
briefly first thing on the call whether the IRT intended for the time to
push later by an hour after the time change (or not).
Our agenda is as follows:
>Confirming regular call schedule
>Call for additional expertise (we are looking for anyone with experience
working with a privacy/proxy service provider that is not affiliated with an
ICANN-accredited registrar, so that we can be sure that impacts on this
business model are fully considered and understood as we are implementing
this program)
>Discussion topic 1: Draft Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation
Policy Outline v1
>Discussion topic 2: Planning for IRT subgroups
>(tentative) Discussion topic 3: ICANN operational planning (this might be
pushed to the following meeting)
>Next steps
The first version of the draft policy outline that we will be discussing is
attached. I will walk through it with you on our call and then request that
you provide feedback on the document between the meeting on the 29th and the
following IRT call, scheduled for 13 December.
For those of you who are celebrating, I hope that you have a wonderful
Thanksgiving holiday.
I look forward to speaking with you all next week!
Best,
Amy
Amy E. Bivins
Registrar Policy Services Manager
Registrar Services and Industry Relations
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104
Email: amy.bivins at icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>
www.icann.org[icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DgMF-g&
c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-TplkjKTey9bg
tdWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=GVFgP12d92WYhc6jmZq6-bDevNhQ4dqcRtgrTY2zaCo&s=V3xsp-P60No3
yMcaIrNokVCQBipZ-ZN6uKk-s273sf0&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20161128/e67e5831/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20161128/e67e5831/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5025 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20161128/e67e5831/smime-0001.p7s>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list