[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call

Mon Nov 28 19:53:37 UTC 2016

Subteam on this sounds totally reasonable to me, though my hope and 
expectation is that it's not a lot of work.  I say that having spent the 
past few weeks fretting about this thing, but the PPSAI policy is pretty 
clear on what a privacy service is, and what the IRTP-C policy is trying 
to capture is also reasonably straightforward.

I also think it's on registrars participating to do the heavy lifting 
here, perhaps that looks like a proposed solution or a strawman as soon 
as this topic gets started.

Graeme

On 11/28/2016 2:19 PM, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>
> Thanks Amy. The “working in parallel” suggestion sounds promising to 
> me. Looking forward to discussing it tomorrow.
>
> Steve
>
> *image001*
>
> *Steven J. Metalitz *|***Partner, through his professional corporation*
>
> T: 202.355.7902 |met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>**
>
> *Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp**LLP*|*www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/>*
>
> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
>
> *_THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY 
> FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED 
> RECIPIENTS._**THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, 
> AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS 
> MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
> REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS 
> STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR 
> TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM 
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.*
>
> *From:*Amy Bivins [mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 2:17 PM
> *To:* Metalitz, Steven; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for flagging this and passing along these documents. This topic 
> is on the agenda for tomorrow (albeit more generally, under discussion 
> topic 2—subgroups). We can re-arrange and discuss this first if the 
> IRT would prefer that.
>
> In short (this is my personal view, not an official staff position), 
> this would be an additional item to add to the work plan. The Final 
> Recommendations on privacy/proxy called for a “compatibility check” 
> with the Transfer Policy, but this appears to be broader than that. We 
> could potentially mitigate the impact by using a subgroup to work on 
> this topic in parallel to the IRT’s other work (meeting on weeks where 
> there is not an IRT meeting) with the hope that volunteers with 
> experience and interest in this topic (and in the Transfer Policy 
> PDP/IRT) will sign up to work with staff to develop a solution that 
> can be brought back to the broader IRT.
>
> Best,
>
> Amy
>
> *From:* Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met at msk.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 1:49 PM
> *To:* Amy Bivins <amy.bivins at icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>>; 
> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
>
> Amy and colleagues,
>
> Does staff have a view on how the timetable and work plan of this IRT 
> would change if the pending motion before the GNSO Council (attached) 
> were adopted and those aspects of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy 
> Part C as they impact registrar-operated p/p services were “placed for 
> evaluation and recommendation” by this IRT, in addition to its other 
> responsibilities?
>
> Could this issue be added to tomorrow’s agenda please?
>
> Thanks.
>
> *image001*
>
> *Steven J. Metalitz *|***Partner, through his professional corporation*
>
> T: 202.355.7902 | met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>**
>
> *Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp**LLP*|*www.msk.com[msk.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.msk.com_&d=DgMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-TplkjKTey9bgtdWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=GVFgP12d92WYhc6jmZq6-bDevNhQ4dqcRtgrTY2zaCo&s=oYgFnpm6Lq4V9WSyjCq7v8lMV4MLhAv1JKnIpcupuFE&e=>*
>
> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
>
> *_THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY 
> FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED 
> RECIPIENTS._**THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, 
> AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS 
> MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
> REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS 
> STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR 
> TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM 
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.*
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> 
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Amy Bivins
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:07 PM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
>
> Hi, All,
>
> I hope you are well!
>
> Our next Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation Program IRT 
> call is scheduled for 29 November 2016, 14:00 UTC. I apologize, I 
> misspoke in our last meeting about what time this meeting is in the 
> U.S. (I said 10 Eastern, but that was before the time change. It is 
> now 9 Eastern). We’ll discuss briefly first thing on the call whether 
> the IRT intended for the time to push later by an hour after the time 
> change (or not).
>
> Our agenda is as follows:
>
> >Confirming regular call schedule
>
> >Call for additional expertise (we are looking for anyone with 
> experience working with a privacy/proxy service provider that is not 
> affiliated with an ICANN-accredited registrar, so that we can be sure 
> that impacts on this business model are fully considered and 
> understood as we are implementing this program)
>
> >Discussion topic 1: Draft Privacy and Proxy Service Provider 
> Accreditation Policy Outline v1
>
> >Discussion topic 2: Planning for IRT subgroups
>
> >(tentative) Discussion topic 3: ICANN operational planning (this 
> might be pushed to the following meeting)
>
> >Next steps
>
> The first version of the draft policy outline that we will be 
> discussing is attached. I will walk through it with you on our call 
> and then request that you provide feedback on the document between the 
> meeting on the 29^th and the following IRT call, scheduled for 13 
> December.
>
> For those of you who are celebrating, I hope that you have a wonderful 
> Thanksgiving holiday.
>
> I look forward to speaking with you all next week!
>
> Best,
>
> Amy
>
> *Amy E. Bivins*
>
> Registrar Policy Services Manager
>
> Registrar Services and Industry Relations
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
>
> Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104
>
> Email: amy.bivins at icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>
>
> www.icann.org[icann.org] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DgMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-TplkjKTey9bgtdWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=GVFgP12d92WYhc6jmZq6-bDevNhQ4dqcRtgrTY2zaCo&s=V3xsp-P60No3yMcaIrNokVCQBipZ-ZN6uKk-s273sf0&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-- 
_________________________
Graeme Bunton
Manager, Management Information Systems
Manager, Public Policy
Tucows Inc.
PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20161128/9d723cec/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20161128/9d723cec/attachment-0001.gif>