[Gnso-rds-pdp-1] Attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat / Drafting team #1: Technical Issue Resolution -and- Academic or Public Interest DNS Research Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 16:00 UTC

[Julie Bisland]

Dear all,


Please find below the Adobe Connect recording, chat and attendance from the Next-Gen RDS drafting team #1: Technical Issue Resolution -and- Academic or Public Interest DNS Research call on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 16:00 UTC.

Adobe Connect recording:   https://participate.icann.org/p5mr9pmojar/<https://participate.icann.org/p5mr9pmojar/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=ba32205baa7d5c6f9f2d022df27c77f6f8ad33f70eee561c5b2448cd9588aee0>

Attendance: Michele Neylon
Greg Aaron, Greg Shatan, James Galvin, Stephanie Perrin, Nathalie Coupet

Staff: Julie Bisland

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Julie

Adobe Connect Chat:

  Julie Bisland: (10/18/2017 09:38) Welcome to the Next-Gen RDS Drafting team #1: Technical Issue Resolution -and- Academic or Public Interest DNS Research on 18 October 2017 at 16:00 UTC.

  Michele Neylon: (10:59) Hi - I'll dial in now

  Julie Bisland: (11:00) I've informed the operator to watch for you, MIchele

  James Galvin (Afilias): (11:02) Only just realized I need to dial-in.  Will do that now.

  Michele Neylon: (11:02) adobe audio should work

  Michele Neylon: (11:02) for values of work ..

  James Galvin (Afilias): (11:03) not giving me that option

  James Galvin (Afilias): (11:03) it's telling me I have to dial in

  Julie Bisland: (11:04) my fault, James, try now

  Julie Bisland: (11:04) you should be able to 'connect audio'

  Julie Bisland: (11:05) audio is only James and you

  James Galvin (Afilias): (11:06) now on Adobe audio

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:10) Can we also join other groups?

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:10) I want to join law enforcement

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:11) are these meetings being archived?

  Michele Neylon: (11:11) Stephanie - they're being archived

  Julie Bisland: (11:11) greg, we can't hear you

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:11) great thanks

  Greg Aaron: (11:11) Dayjob interferes sometimes

  Michele Neylon: (11:12) :)

  Greg Aaron: (11:14) dialing in on eh line but lo moderator is avaialble to take my passcode

  Michele Neylon: (11:15) Julia can you assist him please?

  Michele Neylon: (11:15) Julie even - sorry

  Julie Bisland: (11:15) yes, chatting the operator now

  Greg Aaron: (11:16) I am on on the line now

  Julie Bisland: (11:16) I see you're on, super, thanks Greg

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:19) Hopefully not.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:19) My point, in case anyone missed it, is that this is a bit of a red herring.

 Stephanie Perrin: (11:20) I did not say it is not legitimiate, if I recall correctly.

  Greg Shatan: (11:21) if I understand the aim of

  Greg Shatan: (11:22) this group, it is understand facts rather than to express opinions.

  Greg Shatan: (11:22) if

  Greg Shatan: (11:22) if that research is happening then it is on topic for this group.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:23) Fine.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:23) I will drop any objections I have to us pursuing this

  Greg Shatan: (11:23) we are trying to uncover the facts as we know them to be from our area of experience.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:26) My recollection of this topic in the EWG discussions was that the topic was not dealt with extensively at all, and thus remains very squishy.

  Greg Shatan: (11:26) not on audio yet

  Julie Bisland: (11:31) he's just joining audio

  Greg Shatan: (11:35) happy to be Mr shatan or Greg s.

  Greg Shatan: (11:36) or Greg a and Greg b.

  Julie Bisland: (11:37) no audio, Stephanie

  Julie Bisland: (11:38) please note: Nathalie Coupet has joined the audio bridge and is muted.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:39) It is not a purpose, it is a usage of the data.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:39) I think it makes it more clear.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:40) It is a current useage.  In fact we have two very separate usages to grapple wth

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:41) +1

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:44) Why are we describing the non-academic research as public interest research?  It opens up a giant can of worms, namely the as yet un-defined natrue of the public interest at ICANN.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:45) And if a legitimate company (eg Symantec) does research on the DNS in order to gain market dominance in a particular security matter, is that market research, product (eg algorithm) , or "public interest" research.  I think this is a very dicey area, diffcult to define.

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:46) that was product development research

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:50) wednesday for me, so monday tuesday would be better

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:51) Thanks!

  Greg Aaron: (11:51) Can staff post pages 2 and 3 in a Google doc?

  Greg Aaron: (11:51) Thanks

  Stephanie Perrin: (11:51) Lovely.  If  we could take over the Tuesday regular slot it will be great

  James Galvin (Afilias): (11:51) bye all thanks

  Greg Shatan: (11:52) bye


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-1/attachments/20171018/d6079aec/attachment.html>