[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes & Action items from today's meeting

Farell Folly farellfolly at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 08:50:39 UTC 2016 

Morning All,

I apologize I missed today's call due to technical problem. I'll listen to
the records, read the record, and review action items.

Le mer. 20 avr. 2016 à 07:07, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> a
écrit :

> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the notes and action items from today’s RDS PDP Working
> Group meeting. Please take particular note of action item #8 which requires
> your input within the next 48 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> *Notes & Action items - 20 April 2016*
>
> *1. Roll call / SOIs*
>
>    - Roll call will be taken from Adobe Connect
>    - Update to SOIs: Susan Kawaguchi - Facebook has acquired a registrar.
>    Will update SOI shortly to reflect this.
>
> *2. Report from each small team: Privacy, Data, Purpose*
>
> *Purpose team*: See checklist circulated. A couple more documents are in
> the process of being reviewed, many have already been submitted. Aim to
> have everything completed in next 48 hours. Initial discussions have
> started on what are the most important documents and rationale for why
> these are the most important. These include so far:
>
>    - EWG Recommendations - identified very clearly purposes behind data
>    use (see relevant sections)
>    - 2012 WHOIS Policy Review Team Report
>    - SAC055
>    - 2007 GAC Communique regarding WHOIS
>    - 2013 RAA - includes specific uses by registrars
>    - Article 29 WP opinion (03/2003) on purpose limitation
>    - Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with
>    Privacy Law (2007)
>    - Article 29 WP on legitimate interests of data controller (2014)
>
> Many of the other documents were interesting and somewhat related, but
> didn't specificly identify potential purposes.
>
> *Action item #1*: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next
> week on a list of the most important documents related to purpose
> *Action item #2*: pull out some very short bullet points of the main
> value and points made in these most important document from the summaries
>
> *Data team*: The lines between data and privacy and data and purpose
> aren't always clear in the documents reviewed. Issue of European Data
> Protection legislation has been flagged - moving target at the moment with
> new legislation under consideration. Most if not all documents have now
> been summarised. Initial discussions have started on what are the most
> important documents and rationale for why these are the most important.
> These include so far:
>
>    - Whois Task Force Final Report
>    - SAC 054
>    - EWG Recommendations, including tutorials and FAQs
>    - RA Spec 4
>
> What are next steps? Fact that some things are still evolving, such as
> laws and regulation, it is something to be conscious of, but no need to
> worry about too much at this stage as some items only come back in later
> phases of the PDP..
>
> *Action item #3*: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next
> week on a list of the most important documents related to purpose
> *Action item #4:* pull out some very short bullet points of the main
> value and points made in these most important document from the summaries
>
> *Privacy team*: Number of summaries have already come in. Initial
> discussions have started on what are the most important documents and
> rationale for why these are the most important. These include so far:
>
>    - SAC 054
>    - EWG Recommendations
>
> *Action item #5*: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next
> week on a list of the most important documents related to purpose
> *Action item #6*: pull out some very short bullet points of the main
> value and points made in these most important document from the summaries
>
> *3. Confirm next steps and target date to complete small team outputs*
>
>    - Small team outputs are more than most important documents. List of
>    questions have been circulated (see 'plan to consolidate summaries and
>    complete & present team outputs')
>    - Each team encouraged to provide their feedback to these questions in
>    the next week.
>    - Sub-teams will need to verify summaries submitted to ensure nothing
>    was missed. In the case of some documents, it may be difficult to only have
>    a few bullet points. However, bullet points may help guide full WG in a
>    concise way but recognising that the WG may need to dig into the full
>    details at some point.
>    - Staff will consolidate summaries into one document for each
>    sub-team. Some summaries are uneven depending on the expertise of the
>    members of the team - those with specific expertise or where involved in
>    the development of these documents, are encouraged to review the summaries.
>    - Focus on relevance of the work for the PDP, not necessarily overall
>    importance / relevance in a broader context.
>    - Be careful to not jump ahead in relation to conclusions and blending
>    issues. Maybe first two teams could look at purpose and data without
>    looking at privacy concerns and not mix things? Leave privacy
>    considerations to privacy sub-team and not blend at this stage.
>
> *Action item #7*: Those with specific expertise and/or those who where
> involved in the development of some of these documents, are encouraged to
> review the summaries to ensure that the key points have been included and
> correctly covered.
>
> *4. Confirm next meeting date (Tuesday, 26 April  - may be used for small
> team calls)*
>
>    - Suggestion for next week's meeting to add a little bit of time
>    before and after (135 minutes total) to allow for each of the three teams
>    to have 45 minutes to finalise responses to questions. This will require
>    each of the sub-teams to have done work on the mailing list prior to the
>    call.
>    - Put this suggestion forward to the mailing list to request input.
>    - What needs to happen prior to the next meeting: few summaries
>    missing from each team - these will need to be submitted (staff will send
>    out reminders), consolidated summary documents will be produced in the next
>    few days for sub-team reviews, sub-teams to agree on most relevant
>    documents as well as other questions identified, review summaries and pull
>    out key points from these most relevant documents. Next step would be to
>    finalise work plan. Ideally the WG will be able to complete this part of
>    the work shortly so it can move into the actual deliberations and
>    development of requirements.
>
> *Action item #8*: WG members to provide feedback on this proposed
> approach within next 48 hours so that ample notification can be provided in
> relation to next week's meeting.
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
Best regards,

@__f_f__
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160420/9ae29038/attachment.html>

More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list