[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes & Action items from today's meeting

Wed Apr 20 19:16:22 UTC 2016

Dear Steve,

The proposal is indeed to have 45-minute calls for each of the sub-teams
that are to be scheduled consecutively around the time of the normal WG
meeting as the assumption is that people have kept that time free in their
diaries. Of course, for some that are involved in multiple sub-teams as well
as staff, it may mean up to a 135-minute meeting.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  "Metalitz, Steven" <met at msk.com>
Date:  Wednesday 20 April 2016 at 13:00
To:  Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org"
<gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: Notes & Action items from today's meeting

I am not sure I understand the proposal but would not be in favor of having
a 135-minute WG call next week.  However, it may make sense to schedule
45-minute calls for each of the subteams as they all have a lot of work to
complete.  These could be scheduled consecutively, or in another pattern, so
long as not overlapping (for those who are on more than one subteam).

Steven J. Metalitz |Partner, through his professional corporation
T: 202.355.7902 |met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>
Mitchell Silberberg & KnuppLLP|www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/>
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT,
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR
COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY
BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL
ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 2:04 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes & Action items from today's meeting

Dear All,

Please find below the notes and action items from today¹s RDS PDP Working
Group meeting. Please take particular note of action item #8 which requires
your input within the next 48 hours.

Best regards,

Marika

Notes & Action items - 20 April 2016

1. Roll call / SOIs
* Roll call will be taken from Adobe Connect
* Update to SOIs: Susan Kawaguchi - Facebook has acquired a registrar. Will
update SOI shortly to reflect this.
2. Report from each small team: Privacy, Data, Purpose

Purpose team: See checklist circulated. A couple more documents are in the
process of being reviewed, many have already been submitted. Aim to have
everything completed in next 48 hours. Initial discussions have started on
what are the most important documents and rationale for why these are the
most important. These include so far:
* EWG Recommendations - identified very clearly purposes behind data use
(see relevant sections)
* 2012 WHOIS Policy Review Team Report
* SAC055
* 2007 GAC Communique regarding WHOIS
* 2013 RAA - includes specific uses by registrars
* Article 29 WP opinion (03/2003) on purpose limitation
* Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy
Law (2007)
* Article 29 WP on legitimate interests of data controller (2014)
Many of the other documents were interesting and somewhat related, but
didn't specificly identify potential purposes.

Action item #1: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next week
on a list of the most important documents related to purpose

Action item #2: pull out some very short bullet points of the main value and
points made in these most important document from the summaries

Data team: The lines between data and privacy and data and purpose aren't
always clear in the documents reviewed. Issue of European Data Protection
legislation has been flagged - moving target at the moment with new
legislation under consideration. Most if not all documents have now been
summarised. Initial discussions have started on what are the most important
documents and rationale for why these are the most important. These include
so far:
* Whois Task Force Final Report
* SAC 054
* EWG Recommendations, including tutorials and FAQs
* RA Spec 4
What are next steps? Fact that some things are still evolving, such as laws
and regulation, it is something to be conscious of, but no need to worry
about too much at this stage as some items only come back in later phases of
the PDP.. 

Action item #3: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next week
on a list of the most important documents related to purpose

Action item #4: pull out some very short bullet points of the main value and
points made in these most important document from the summaries

Privacy team: Number of summaries have already come in. Initial discussions
have started on what are the most important documents and rationale for why
these are the most important. These include so far:
* SAC 054
* EWG Recommendations
Action item #5: Sub-team to try and reach rough consensus in the next week
on a list of the most important documents related to purpose

Action item #6: pull out some very short bullet points of the main value and
points made in these most important document from the summaries

3. Confirm next steps and target date to complete small team outputs
* Small team outputs are more than most important documents. List of
questions have been circulated (see 'plan to consolidate summaries and
complete & present team outputs')
* Each team encouraged to provide their feedback to these questions in the
next week.
* Sub-teams will need to verify summaries submitted to ensure nothing was
missed. In the case of some documents, it may be difficult to only have a
few bullet points. However, bullet points may help guide full WG in a
concise way but recognising that the WG may need to dig into the full
details at some point.
* Staff will consolidate summaries into one document for each sub-team. Some
summaries are uneven depending on the expertise of the members of the team -
those with specific expertise or where involved in the development of these
documents, are encouraged to review the summaries.
* Focus on relevance of the work for the PDP, not necessarily overall
importance / relevance in a broader context.
* Be careful to not jump ahead in relation to conclusions and blending
issues. Maybe first two teams could look at purpose and data without looking
at privacy concerns and not mix things? Leave privacy considerations to
privacy sub-team and not blend at this stage.
Action item #7: Those with specific expertise and/or those who where
involved in the development of some of these documents, are encouraged to
review the summaries to ensure that the key points have been included and
correctly covered.

4. Confirm next meeting date (Tuesday, 26 April  - may be used for small
team calls)
* Suggestion for next week's meeting to add a little bit of time before and
after (135 minutes total) to allow for each of the three teams to have 45
minutes to finalise responses to questions. This will require each of the
sub-teams to have done work on the mailing list prior to the call.
* Put this suggestion forward to the mailing list to request input.
* What needs to happen prior to the next meeting: few summaries missing from
each team - these will need to be submitted (staff will send out reminders),
consolidated summary documents will be produced in the next few days for
sub-team reviews, sub-teams to agree on most relevant documents as well as
other questions identified, review summaries and pull out key points from
these most relevant documents. Next step would be to finalise work plan.
Ideally the WG will be able to complete this part of the work shortly so it
can move into the actual deliberations and development of requirements.
Action item #8: WG members to provide feedback on this proposed approach
within next 48 hours so that ample notification can be provided in relation
to next week's meeting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160420/e7774fda/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160420/e7774fda/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160420/e7774fda/smime.p7s>