[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Next AoC WHOIS Review

[Gomes, Chuck]

I wonder if the RDS PDP WG or possibly the leaders of the WG with support from the full WG should prepare and submit a letter to the Board on this?  Thoughts?  It is definitely an awkward situation but one that I think needs to be dealt with in some way.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:52 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Next AoC WHOIS Review

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:43:15PM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> 
> Any WHOIS-RT should be delayed until at least 12 months after this PDP is completed.

I don't see how that's going to be possible.  The proposed bylaws won't make that possible, and as nearly as I can tell they are an accurate reflection of what the CCWG's report said.  If the bylaws don't reflect what the CCWG-Accountability report says, there's a much bigger process problem than the waste of resources and energy: many people feel that a big problem historically has been implementation of community instructions, and if we don't cleave tightly to the community instructions in this case we shall have a serious legitimacy problem.
 
I agree it'd be wasteful, but I'm not sure how to avoid it.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg