[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The overflowing list (was Re: A new and rather important document with respect to jurisdiction issues)

[Sam Lanfranco]

On July 15^th Andrew Sullivan posted with regard to additional documents:

“/I don't object, but I'm wondering whether there is really anything new 
//in most of the additional documents people are bringing.”.
/
While it is agreed that there is nocut off date for additional documents 
one simple practice that would make additions manageable is that
the contributor/poster offer a very short explanation of the relevance 
of the document. Possible points would include:

  * Is this a new point to consider, or does it add weight to an
    existing point already being considered?
  * Does it address a principle, a single or cluster of proposed data
    points, or a use case?
  * Does it address the issue of what is within or outside the ICANN
    remit in this exercise?
  * Does it reference an external factor that would impact on the public
    interest dimensions of a data decision?

Sam L. NPOC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160719/1afca817/attachment.html>