[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

[Sam Lanfranco]

Michele,

Sorry if the comment was overly obtuse. Just saying that lots is 
happening outside the walled remit of ICANN with regard to data 
retention, privacy and security, and that -"with the rest of our time 
)-:"- we, including ICANN, need to have a stakeholder presence there 
too, and maybe inside the walls listen to the echos of what is going on 
"out there" in the rest of the internet ecosystem.

Sam L

On 2016-07-22 8:10 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
> Sam
>
> >>But I will suggest that in parallel ICANN as an organization, the 
> ICANN multistakeholder community and stakeholders beyond ICANN, have 
> to develop strategies for engagement with ongoing >>efforts outside 
> ICANN around how to authenticate law enforcement data requests.
>
> Sorry, but what has this got to with the WG?
>
> Also, ICANN does not hold registration data, so I can’t understand why 
> ICANN developing anything in this realm would be of any benefit.
>
> As an Irish company we will deal with Irish law enforcement. Overseas 
> LEA can liaise with their Irish counterparts and comply with Irish law 
> if they want to submit any data requests.
>
> Regards
>
> Michele
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160723/d4ada7cf/attachment.html>