[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

[Sivasubramanian M]

Who are the policy makers in the multi-stakeholder framework?  Why not
ICANN pay attention, at least to facilitate discussion on  this topic?

Sivasubramanian M

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck at verisign.com
> wrote:

> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 10:58 AM
> *To:* Sivasubramanian M
> *Cc:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical
> consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )
>
>
>
> It is not clear to me that the IETF needs to focus on the “complexities
> of matters concerning Registrant Data” but I will let our IETF experts
> comment on that.
>
>
>
> [SAH] It’s important to note that the IETF process we followed to develop
> RDAP did indeed include (for example) considerations for the protection of
> registrant data, but we tried to stay away from enshrining policies
> associated with that data. That’s work to be done by policy makers.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160725/2d9e294d/attachment.html>