[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1

[Farell Folly]

Hello,

Can you or the staff provide me again with the link to the wiki ?

Le mar. 1 mars 2016 à 15:43, Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com> a écrit :

> Good morning Scott - staff will add RFC 7485 to the set of background
> materials posted on the wiki.
>
>
> At 07:08 AM 3/1/2016, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> Content-Language: en-US
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
> boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A37B30FBRN1WNEXMBX02vc_"
>
>
>
> Only one suggestion, Chuck. Looking at the questions posed in #12, I
> wondered if question #1 (“Who should have access to gTLD registration data
> and why?”) is indeed the first question we should ask. I would find it
> helpful to understand what “gTLD registration data” is before I think about
> who should have access to it, so I would like to suggest that the current
> question #4 (“What data should be collected, stored, and disclosed?”) be
> moved to question #1.
>
> When we get around to asking “What data should be collected, stored, and
> disclosed?” it might be helpful to read RFC 7485
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7485>. It’s an inventory of
> information that was available via WHOIS at the time the IETF’s WEIRDS
> working group wrote the document. It might not be 100% accurate now, but I
> believe it’s still the best summary of current practice.
>
> Scott
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 4:14 PM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1
> *Importance:* High
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded regarding the approach to a work plan
> proposed by the Leadership Team in our meeting last week and online
> afterwards. I understand that some of you may still have concerns about the
> proposed approach but the Leadership Team decided that it might be more
> effective to deal with any remaining concerns as we discuss and refine a
> draft work plan.  So we prepared a DRAFT work plan for Phase 1 and have
> attached it.  An overview of the plan will be provided in our WG meeting
> tomorrow with opportunity for questions and initial discussion.  We will
> continue to discuss the plan on this list after tomorrow’s meeting and
> leading up to our Marrakech meeting on 9 March, at which time we will try
> to finalize it if possible.
>
> Note that whatever we finalize a work plan will have to be flexible.  It
> will have to be updated as we go depending on our actual progress.  Also
> note, that the details for what are now steps 13 to 15 will have to be
> developed after we finalize the results of step 12 and the preceding steps.
>
> We encourage all of you to at least do a quick review of this document
> before our meeting tomorrow if possible.  Regardless, we ask everyone to
> review it in detail after tomorrow’s call. If you are unable to participate
> in the WG meeting tomorrow, in addition to reviewing the draft plan
> thoroughly, please listen to the recording of the call.  We strongly
> request everyone to communicate your questions and comments on the list so
> that we can start to refine the plan online and be try to finalize it in
> our meeting on 9 March.
>
> Thanks in advance for your cooperation and contributions.
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160301/fe71fbb6/attachment.html>