[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposal and Poll Invitation

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks for the feedback Rob. We may indeed find the need for more time for the polls going forward but I would like to share some thoughts:  1) unless we want our phase 1 work to last many years, I think it is going to be essential for WG members to do their best to try to regularly participate in the process in as short a time as possible; 2) all of us will have occasions when we can't make deadlines but the currently proposed process has overlapping opportunities to make up for those occasional times; 3) if those occasions become standard procedure instead of exceptional, then that will significantly slow us down; so, whatever process we follow, we will need everyone to commit to regular and timely input as much as possible.

Chuck

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:> 
> Also, 5 days to vote is probably too short a time period, there may/will/is-likely-to-be discussion on-list about proposals, so forcing a vote on short timescales for those of us without staff to dedicate just tothe WG will I think impose unworkable time restrictions
> 
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>