[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [Just for Info] DDoS Attacks against Dyn - Schneier on Security

[Farell Folly]

You are right Chuck about the WG's role ,

It was just to call our attention so that it can help us set up better
requirements or  have a better understanding on security issues associated
with the Next Gen-RDS (at the era of IoT.)

Best Regards
@__f_f__
about.me/farell
________________________________.
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.
Le 24 oct. 2016 13:06, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> a écrit :

> Farell,
>
>
>
> I don’t think that WG has any direct role of preventing such attacks but
> it is possible that some of the possible requirements we consider could
> have indirect impacts.  I believe we will need to consider whether and how
> an RDS could be used to facilitate attacks.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Farell Folly
> *Sent:* Monday, October 24, 2016 5:42 AM
> *To:* RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [Just for Info] DDoS Attacks against Dyn -
> Schneier on Security
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to share this with you. It will question  one more time how
> the Internet ecosystem  will handle this IoT era and what role we can (this
> WG)  play to ensure that the best measures / funtionalities /requirement
> are in place to prevent or reduce  such attacks on the DNS infrastructure.
> Good reading.
>
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/10/ddos_attacks_ag.html
>
> Best Regards
> @__f_f__
> about.me/farell
> ________________________________.
> Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20161024/916fa990/attachment.html>