[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Notes from today's RDS PDP WG meeting

[Greg Aaron]

Rob: the professionals in that area disagree.  Reference for example: http://docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg-ipc_Advisory_WhoisDataForPhishingSiteTakeDown200803.pdf 
It's a document in the WG reference list.
Like I said earlier, it's not the proper time to debate the merits of the various "possible requirements."  
All best,
--Greg


-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:54 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Notes from today's RDS PDP WG meeting

> Safeguard 3: Should Registry Operators undertake periodic security 
> checks to analyze whether domains in its gTLD are being used for 
> threats to security, such as pharming, phishing, malware and botnets?

None of which requires "registration" data ...

pharming = content
phishing = content
malware = content
botnets = traffic [and are primarily ip based not domain based] etc


Rob
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg