[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Contractibility, PBC and required contact methods....

Jeremy Malcolm jmalcolm at eff.org
Thu Aug 24 17:30:15 UTC 2017


On 24/8/17 9:15 am, Greg Aaron wrote:
>
> Two WG calls ago, we had extensive discussion about how legal
> processes require multiple methods of contactability.  And require
> physical addresses, not just electronic service.
>

I missed that call, but it's not quite accurate since a court can order
substituted service by email.  Even publishing a notice in the newspaper
can be used for service if the court allows it.

In any case, I agree with Volker that there should not be three
mandatory contact methods.  Physical and/or email address should be enough.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170824/a62a68d4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170824/a62a68d4/signature.asc>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list