[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting - Tuesday 6 June

[Stephanie Perrin]

Oh, I accept that we are going to have to get outside counsel.  I am 
just putting a marker in, that we probably have different views on how 
to seek advice from counsel.  Our goals are different.

Stephanie


On 2017-06-05 19:18, Adam Lanier wrote:
> Stephanie,
>
> Do you have an alternate suggestion then? It sounds as if you think 
> hiring outside council may not be a good idea.
>
> On another note, it seems to me that there is considerable legal and 
> technical talent already in this WG.  Does everyone feel that there is 
> no way for us to educate each other and fill in at least some of the gaps?
>
>
> Adam Lanier | Director Technical Operations | Clearnetwork | 
> alanier at clearnetwork.com <mailto:alanier at voyantinc.com> | +1 
> 732-335-1500 ext. 525
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 6:42 PM, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
>> I certainly agree with Andrew that I at least have a technical 
>> expertise gap, not so much a public policy and legal gap.  I would 
>> also add that the risk in hiring legal counsel to advise us, is that 
>> we will not agree on what questions to ask.  For those of us 
>> advocating the public policy goals of human rights and protection of 
>> data, it will hardly be satisfactory to hire a "privacy goalie" who 
>> will be trying to find ways to deflect implementing more stringent 
>> data protection.  We have different goals here.
>>
>> Stephanie
>>
>>
>> On 2017-06-05 18:28, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:16:56PM +0100, Paul Keating wrote:
>>>> I would like to reiterate my request that we attempt to formally engage counsel for the e.g. Who can provide meaningful legal advice.
>>>>
>>> While I am by no means opposed to that suggestion, I worry about two
>>> issues: (1) that it'll blow such budget as we maybe have and (2) that
>>> once we do this we ought also to engage (formally) technical expertise
>>> and so on.  Without wishing to impugn anyone, I will confess that in
>>> this group gaps in legal knowledge are way less obvious to me than
>>> gaps in technical knowledge.  This is doubtless because of my own
>>> background, and not the relative desity of knowledge gaps.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170605/79d7c3eb/attachment.html>