[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Who is in charge? (was Re: Why the thin data is necessary)]

[Michele Neylon - Blacknight]

Neil

I’m also a bit confused by this.

If the current whois were replaced by RDAP would you have issues with it?

Note I am talking solely about changing the technical system not any of the policies etc.,

Regards

Michele


--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ 
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

On 08/06/2017, 16:32, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Neil Schwartzman" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of neil at cauce.org> wrote:

    Allow me to restate: I object to place limits on access to WHOIS data.
    
    
    > On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi,
    > 
    > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:17:58PM +0200, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
    >> 
    >> That said gated access needs some sort of parsing model. which is why I object to it in any form.
    > 
    > I don't understand this.  RDAP is JSON.  You can parse all day long.
    > 
    > A
    > 
    > -- 
    > Andrew Sullivan
    > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
    
    _______________________________________________
    gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
    gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg