[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Who is in charge? (was Re: Why the thin data is necessary)]

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Rob.  We will consider the various options in our next call and on the list.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 8:30 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Who is in charge? (was Re: Why the thin data is necessary)]

> The EWG defined a minimum public data set. This group may not like
> "minimum" but "public data set" seems less controversial?

Public Data Set makes a lot of sense to me

Rob


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg