[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Thu Jun 15 13:35:40 UTC 2017


Thanks for asking Jonathan.  Those came under the Other category, the last question in the poll.  For those we agreed to deliberate on those suggestions as we proceed over the next several weeks and months when we get beyond the Minimum Public Data Set elements.  The same applies to the contacts you mention.



Chuck



From: jonathan matkowsky [mailto:jonathan.matkowsky at riskiq.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:07 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
Cc: elsakoo at gmail.com; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week



Hi, Chuck. Sorry I missed the call due to travel and scheduling conflicts. I recall that I had mentioned in the poll that reseller data and registrar abuse contacts should be in the minimum public data set, but I don't see it on the list. Since the list topic is from the poll, I thought I would ask for some clarification so I hope this is not considered off-topic.



I also wanted to know when I can bring up that the registrant, admin, billing and technical country should be in the minimum public data set because of various restricted lists impacting on many countries. The public has the right to know from a minimum public data set whether they would be doing business with a restricted country.




Jonathan Matkowsky



On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>> wrote:

   Feel free to suggest it Allison.  We will consider it in light of our approved work plan.



   Chuck



   From: allison nixon [mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com<mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com>]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 4:08 PM
   To: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
   Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
   Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week



   Thanks. I'd like to submit in writing a discussion topic for next meeting. My dayjob duties regularly intersect with the scheduled calls and this isn't avoidable for me, despite being an active member on the list.



   On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:

      The Leadership Team chooses the topics based on the results of the WG meeting.



      Note that recordings and transcripts are provided.



      Chuck



      From: allison nixon [mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com<mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com>]
      Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:17 PM
      To: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
      Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
      Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week



      how are the discussion topics chosen? on the call? i can't make the calls due to work.



      On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>> wrote:

         One of the things we forgot to do at the end of our agenda yesterday was to identify the list discussion topics that everyone is asked to focus on this week.  Fortunately as a result of the discussion in the meeting and the questions in the poll, it appears that most everyone naturally focused on the appropriate topics which include the questions in the poll as well as the tentative conclusions that were reached in the meeting.  Here is a summary of the focus topics for this week:



         New agreements reached and accepted as tentative conclusions

         *      The WG agreed to adopt the term "minimum public data set" to refer to the set of data elements deliberated thus far - that is, the list of fields that will always be public no matter the gTLD; short form focus topic = ‘minimum public data set’.
         *      The WG agreed to add DNSSEC info to the ‘minimum public data set’; short form focus topic = ‘DNSSEC Info’.
         *      The WG agreed that the expiration date should not be removed from the "Minimum Public Data Set"; short form of focus topic = ‘Expiration Date’.



         From the poll

         *      Purposes of minimum public data set elements identified to date:

            *   Domain name
            *   Registrar name
            *   Registrar ID (Registrar IANA ID)
            *   Whois Server & Referral URL
            *   Name Servers
            *   Statuses
            *   Updated Date, Creation Date, Expiration Date

         (These topics may be discussed as a whole or as individual discussion topics.)



         According to our recently instituted procedures, please limit list discussions to the above topics this week.  As a reminder, the three rules that are particularly applicable are:

         1.     Discussion topics must be narrowly defined.
         2.     Responses must focus on the narrowly defined topics.
         3.     Ok to note dependency on another topic and state assumptions made, but keep focus on-topic.



         Thanks for your cooperation.



         Chuck






         _______________________________________________
         gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
         gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg







      --

      _________________________________
      Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.







   --

   _________________________________
   Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.


   _______________________________________________
   gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
   gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170615/871304bc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list