[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Test Msg

Nathalie Peregrine nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
Mon Mar 13 08:07:08 UTC 2017


HI Chuck,

Yes, you replied to all on Tan Sze Ming’s message. Szeming had cc-ed the ntfy list, which rejects all posts by non-staff. However, given the public, open list was also on the list of recipients, the message made it to the list.

As a reminder to all: Please use gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> for all your correspondence. The ntfy-gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:ntfy-gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> list is for staff only to circulate dial in details of WG conference calls to members only, please do not post to that list, it will be rejected, and do not share information circulated on that list.

Kind regards

Nathalie

From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Reply-To: "cgomes at verisign.com" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 8:43 AM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Test Msg

It appears that my response to the test message was rejected.

Staff: Con you trouble shoot this?

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170313/7478583d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list