[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] a suggestion for "purpose in detail"

[Gomes, Chuck]

I don't recall them saying we need  a purpose for every data element but I think they said we need a purpose for collection and a different purpose for public access, etc.   I could be wrong. We do need to clarify. 

Chuck

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:53 PM, "ajs at anvilwalrusden.com" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:06:07PM +0000, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> Do you think that we need to develop a purpose for every data element in the RDS or would it suffice to develop a purpose for collection of RDS data elements, a purpose for public display of RDS data elements and a purpose for gated access to RDS data elements?
>> 
> 
> The experts last week suggested that each element needs to be
> evaluated.  I fear the size of that rat-hole, however, and wonder
> whether it might not be enough to use classes.
> 
>> If we considered data elements by class, what would you suggest are the classes?
> 
> Well, I suggested some here for the thin data.  These turn out to be
> simple cases because they're all pretty much necessarily public for
> the functioning of the system at all (that is, if one is going to
> argue that one of the thin elements ought to be private, one is in
> effect arguing that we should not have an RDS.  That's ok, but it's a
> different argument.)
> 
> For the other data, we have several different classes of contact
> information: the identity of the contact in question, the street
> address, phone number, and email address, and fax numbers (because
> everyone is using 1980s tech for communications now ;-) ).  This
> contact info seems to me to be one dimension of the issues.  The
> second dimension is the purpose of the contact itself: what is that
> contact information for?  The purpose of the technical contact, for
> instance, is bound to be different from the admin or registrant
> contact data.  So, I would propose first going through the contact
> data with the purpose-of-having-that-contact filter.  Then we could
> discuss the disclosure of the different items I mention above.
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>