[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] a suggestion for "purpose in detail"

[John Bambenek]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 23:05, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2017-03-22 03:38, John Bambenek wrote:
>> Registrars need to collect authoritative DNS servers from end
>> consumers or it doesn't work.
> 
> Yes, for almost all gtlds and cctlds that is the case
> 
> They're not necessarily shown in a whois, and that in no way stops t'interwebbyfacetweetnet functioning exactly as designed.
> For example there are no nameservers listed on a current .tel whois for nic.tel yet whois.nic.tel resolves ok
> 
> Indeed because that data is available through other 'correct' methods, following good-old 3rd-normal-form of db design would say that is a good reason not to have it in rds/whois !
> 
>> I never said RDS/Whois in that
>> statement.
> 
> You mentioned gated access, which we were discussing about in terms of gated access to RDS :)

Fair enough, I could have been more precise 

> 
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg