[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Reputation systems are not just nice to have (was Re: What we want redux)

[John Bambenek]

To confirm and clarify your meaning... you don't think there should be a
WHOIS/RDS and the only means to contact a domain owner should be on
their website. Is that correct?


On 10/3/2017 4:28 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 3/10/17 2:15 pm, allison nixon wrote:
>> Whether or not the EFF agrees with the work of anti-abuse
>> professionals may be a point of debate (or may not, I don't know if
>> your org even likes the idea of anti-abuse or not), but if the EFF
>> believes this information has no utility for our purposes then that is
>> completely factually incorrect.
> Sure we like the idea, actually we ourselves also do this sort of work;
> see our current front page feature at eff.org headed "Phish for the
> Future", which (yes) includes some information gained through WHOIS.  So
> we are not totally misinformed about this issue as your reply seems to
> assume.  We just don't think that there should be any additional
> personal information about registrants made available through the RDS,
> even if it is limited to security researchers or anti-abuse specialists.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
--

John Bambenek

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171003/d2527d1f/attachment.html>