[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Reputation systems are not just nice to have (was Re: What we want redux)

[John Bambenek]

I am not sure why it follows that if abuse were a primary purpose that means more data gets collected... no one is asking for more info. 

--
John Bambenek

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 17:04, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/10/17 2:56 pm, allison nixon wrote:
>> Those and others are currently listed on ICANN's website as uses for
>> WHOIS data. To reject anti-abuse as a purpose would be to shift away
>> from the currently accepted purposes of WHOIS.
> 
> I'm arguing that it's a secondary purpose, not the primary purpose.  A
> secondary purpose is a purpose for which information, that was gathered
> for a primary purpose, can also legitimately be used.  So for ICANN to
> call these uses of WHOIS data "legitimate" does not imply for purposes
> of data protection law that they are the primary purpose for collection
> of that data.
> 
> The distinction is that if anti-abuse is a primary purpose, we would be
> collecting a lot more information than if it is a secondary purpose.  (I
> accept you're not arguing for the collection of additional information,
> but my opposition to anti-abuse as a primary purpose is to counter such
> arguments.)
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org
> 
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
> 
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
> 
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg