[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Reputation systems are not just nice to have (was Re: What we want redux)

[Greg Shatan]

Let's remember we're all part of an ecosystem, with valuable roles to play
(even the lawyers and policy people).  We should make genuine efforts to
understand each other's experiences, knowledge and perspectives.  This
jousting is probably not the fastest or easiest way to go about it.
Thinking you know someone else's job better than they do isn't either.
Trying to score points to advance a policy objective at the expense of
getting at the facts isn't either. We should treat this more like an
investigation and less like a litigation.

And I don't mean an investigation of each other -- a common investigation.

Greg Shatan

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:45 PM John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:

> I may be operating under a bad assumption, if so, please correct me. My
> understanding is that the registries and registrars contribution to
> anti-abuse is in the response to complaints others make. Are there
> proactive measures you take against abusive domain names I should be aware
> of? Do you suspend abusive domains, those engaged in brand impersonation,
> or otherwise illegal activities based on your own initiative?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 7:50 PM, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:
>
> >> And yet we are told by
> >> those who do NOT work in this field and do NOT contribute to solving
> >> this problem, that we don't need this information.
> >
> > A number of those contributing to the discussion are registrars and
> web-hosts, who deal every day with abuse issues, so very much are the
> people who deal with "solving this problem" (and are also those telling you
> that WHOIS data contributes to abuse against real-people rather than
> abstracts)
> >
> >> As far as I can tell, only the anti-abuse people have even proposed a
> >> compromise... whois privacy for free.
> >
> > Some registrars have offered this for years, although now ICANN thinks
> it should control/set policy/tax that kind of service it may not remain
> 'free' for long, and certainly isn't free to the registrar to provide (and
> still leaves the GDPR issue over escrow outstanding)
> >
> >
> > Rob
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171004/bb8899c2/attachment.html>