[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: IMPORTANT
theo geurts
gtheo at xs4all.nl
Fri Oct 13 18:28:42 UTC 2017
https://www.privacytrust.com/guidance/gdpr-vs-eprivacy-regulation.html
Eprivacy seems to be delayed though
https://iapp.org/news/a/libe-eprivacy-vote-delayed-juri-itre-and-edps-weigh-in/
Theo
On 13-10-2017 20:22, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> I believe the Art 29 group has commented on this matter, please check
> their website for the relevant documents, as I don't believe we have
> included them in our document respository.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
>
> On 2017-10-13 14:16, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> the Privacy Directive, as I understand it is not superseded by GDPR
>>
>> I presume you are referring to the European Union's e-Privacy
>> Directive (2002/58/EC). If so, from what I understand it is currently
>> being updated so to be consistent with the GDPR. As of last month the
>> proposed revisions were with the Council of the European Union. I'm
>> not sure what movement there has been since then.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: IMPORTANT
>>> Local Time: 13 October 2017 1:51 PM
>>> UTC Time: 13 October 2017 12:51
>>> From: jonathan.matkowsky at riskiq.net
>>> To: Chuck <consult at cgomes.com>, gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>
>>> Chuck, I don’t understand how anyone can share government
>>> perspective, and not represent a group in doing so.
>>>
>>> I wanted to know whether leadership team has decided to conduct a
>>> DPIA, and if so, whether you are using the UK’s guide. I would think
>>> while it makes sense to be looking at the purposes of collection,
>>> what is primary and secondary cannot be the focus because that
>>> presupposes knowing who the controller is. We have not yet decided
>>> that as a working group. The memo did not necessarily take into
>>> account the role of offering accreditation services and ICANN’s mission.
>>>
>>> But it appears whether it’s primary or secondary doesn’t matter for
>>> purposes of defining purposes of collecting each data element.
>>>
>>> We are not defining the purposes of collecting Whois data but the
>>> data elements of the next generation of Whois. That’s what I meant
>>> the other day regarding RDS.
>>>
>>> To do that, we are not limited to the data elements that currently
>>> exist as when we go through this exercise to fulfill ICANN’s mission
>>> from ICANN’s perspective including all those involved in
>>> cybersecurity, or to offer accredited registration services. The
>>> primary purpose of accredited services is to fulfill the mission,
>>> and to provide that staple of a service to those that register names
>>> with an accredited registrar. It seems we need to carefully consider
>>> not only Spec 3 to the 2013 RAA but also Paragraph 14 to the 2017
>>> global amendment to the registry agreement which says unique DNS
>>> records may be supportable in the RDS if RDAP supports it. We
>>> therefore need to know what RDAP can support, and at the very least
>>> need to consider all elements from RFC 7485. This is not a simple
>>> exercise, and will take **significant** time.
>>>
>>> As we undertake this, we must know from WS law firm what role the
>>> public directory service plays in the Privacy Directive, as I
>>> understand it is not superseded by GDPR, and Whois is a public
>>> directory. This is critical analysis we are possibly missing. Can
>>> you ask them to address this ASAP please?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:35 AM Chuck <consult at cgomes.com
>>> <mailto:consult at cgomes.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have 34 volunteers at present; it would help a lot if we
>>> could get a lot more so that teams will not have to cover more
>>> than one of the nine purposes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks much to the 34 of you who have volunteered. I hope many
>>> more will complete the poll and volunteer in the remaining 6 or
>>> so hours of the poll.
>>>
>>>
>>> We are particularly low for the government perspective.
>>> Remember, team members are not being asked to represent any
>>> group but rather to share their understanding of the perspective.
>>>
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>>> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
>>> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>>> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lisa
>>> Phifer
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:19 AM
>>> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from
>>> 10 October Meeting
>>> *Importance:* High
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> In follow-up to this week’s WG meeting, *all RDS PDP WG Members*
>>> are encouraged to participate in the following poll:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5LXJRF3
>>>
>>>
>>> Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline
>>> reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086772/Poll-from-10OctoberCall.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> *This poll will close at COB Wednesday 11 October. Expressions
>>> of interest gathered through this poll will be used form
>>> drafting teams.*
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that you _must be a WG Member_ to participate in
>>> polls. If you are a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls,
>>> you must first contact gnso-secs at icann.org
>>> <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org> to upgrade to WG Member.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Matkowsky
>>>
>>> *******************************************************************
>>> This message was sent from RiskIQ, and is intended only for the
>>> designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary
>>> information and may be subject to confidentiality protections. If
>>> you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or
>>> distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify
>>> the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> *******************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171013/30ca2acd/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list