[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

Fri Oct 20 00:01:32 UTC 2017

I’ve no idea what the “correct” answer is to your questions. And they are valid ones.
However I get the impression that ICANN (corporate) is looking for input and guidance on followup questions.
What isn’t that clear to me personally is how that can be structured

The legal memo is, in my view, a solid document. The questions asked covered some areas that we covered with the data protection experts and the external legal counsel, but also went further.
What I also liked was that instead of simply analysing the status quo vs GDPR they tried to come up with some solutions.
I’m not suggesting for an instant that any of the solutions would be easy to implement, but there are a few things in there that could be viewed as starting points.

The key question for members of this group is very simple.

Do you want to work together to find a solution that takes into consideration the legal advice or not?

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
https://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland  Company No.: 370845
From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Date: Thursday 19 October 2017 at 17:20
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

I am curious as to how the questions are being framed.   Who is the client, ICANN the MS body, ICANN the CEO and staff (who have been found to be a co-controller and therefore have an interest in avoiding fines) or ICANN the Board.

There are different interests at stake here, I  think it would be useful to get a fuller understanding of how Teresa Swineheart is handling the development of questions.

Stephanie Perrin

On 2017-10-19 10:43, Chuck wrote:

Greg,

Having just finished reading the Hamilton memo, I don't understand why you

think the WG needs a presentation?  What would a presentation from Teresa or

other ICANN staff person provide us that we couldn't get from the memo

itself and other sources such as the ICANN Blog, etc.?

Can you identify any advice from Hamilton that would supplant work we have

been doing?  If so, please identify it.

In my opinion:

- The advice of ways forward fits nicely into our policy development

processes.

- The Hamilton Memo confirms much of what we already heard from the DP

experts and Wilson Sonsini so we now have it from three separate sources.

- You are absolutely that we "need to understand and track the legal

advice being made" and that it overlaps what we are doing but I think that

will help us.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----

From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gca at icginc.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:25 AM

To: Chuck <consult at cgomes.com><mailto:consult at cgomes.com>; 'Alan Greenberg' <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca><mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>;

'GNSO RDS PDP' <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

Subject: RE: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

Dear WG  leadership:

As we expected, this ICANN Org effort will have a profound effect on our

work.  We will need to understand and track the legal advice being made,

which overlaps with and in some places may supplant work we have been doing.

And the memo's "Finding New Ways Forward"  section (3.9) provides advice for

the policy-making process.  Clearly our WG needs (deserves) a presentation

at Abu Dhabi from Teresa Swinehart, who is heading up this effort.

Could this be done at the WG meeting on Wednesday 1 November?

Wednesday will be better attended, both in-person and remotely.  (Some

members may still be in transit during the WG's early Saturday morning

meeting.  And the Saturday meeting is at a challenging time for those

participating remotely -- ~6:30 a.m. Saturday morning in Europe /  12:30

a.m. Saturday East Coast USA.)

As part of the briefing, it would be good to hear about this effort's

schedule, workplan, and immediate next steps.  The memo says: "We intend to

provide a series of memorandums, which will address different aspects of the

issue and where the  scope and topics of each such memorandum will be

discussed and agreed with ICANN. We understand that ICANN intends to make

each memorandum publicly available."

All best,

--Greg

-----Original Message-----

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>

[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Chuck

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 8:51 AM

To: 'Alan Greenberg' <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca><mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>; 'GNSO RDS PDP'

<gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

I want to call attention to the following paragraph:

"The memo highlights the complexity of these issues in the domain name

space, and concludes that the current open, publicly available WHOIS

services cannot remain unchanged. The WHOIS system has to become adaptable

to address the GDPR from the European perspective, as well as other changing

regulations around the world."

After input from Data Protection experts, the Wilson Sonsini memo and now

this memo, do any in the WG disagree with this statement?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>

[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:04 AM

To: GNSO RDS PDP <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

Full Blog post is at

https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-and-privacy-update.  Alan

At 19/10/2017 12:23 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Perhaps it has already been posted, but if not, ICANN has received the

first part of the independent legal analysis of the GDPR in relation to

WHOIS that had been commissioned.

It can be found at

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdpr-memorandum-part1-16oct

17-e

n.pdf.

Alan

_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171020/71da7226/attachment-0001.html>