[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Legal Opinion on GDPR - Part 1

[John Bambenek]

Feel free to correct me, but as far as I can tell, I (and my side) has been the only one who has suggested a solution (whois privacy for free). As far as I can tell, the only other solution mentioned by the other side has been for whois to go dark (aka “go get rekt”). 

Can someone list the other solutions proposed?

--
John Bambenek

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 13:25, "benny at nordreg.se" <benny at nordreg.se> wrote:
> 
> Well it all depends on what solution we come up with. There are no doubt that the status quo  solution will not happen and the sooner that side of the group starts to come up with ideas / solutions the sooner we can get on track to ensure that there will be as little damage as possible given the circumstances… 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Med vänliga hälsningar / Kind Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
> 
> Benny Samuelsen
> Registry Manager - Domainexpert
> 
> Nordreg AB - ICANN accredited registrar
> IANA-ID: 638
> Phone: +46.42197000
> Direct: +47.32260201
> Mobile: +47.40410200
> 
>> On 20 Oct 2017, at 12:42, John Bambenek <jcb at bambenekconsulting.com> wrote:
>> 
>> And if that happens, I suspect the collateral damage that causes will entail a course correction. 
>> 
>> --
>> John Bambenek
>> 
>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 12:04, "benny at nordreg.se" <benny at nordreg.se> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well that will only cover no EU address domains soon… 
>>> --
>>> Med vänliga hälsningar / Kind Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
>>> 
>>> Benny Samuelsen
>>> Registry Manager - Domainexpert
>>> 
>>> Nordreg AB - ICANN accredited registrar
>>> IANA-ID: 638
>>> Phone: +46.42197000
>>> Direct: +47.32260201
>>> Mobile: +47.40410200
>>> 
>>>> On 20 Oct 2017, at 11:53, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> How often do people who actually research abuse and criminality need to say this is not true?
>>>> 
>>>> “BTW, in most combat of malicious activities targeting the average user, knowing the actual identity of the perpetrator is not really that useful. Specially because it's likely fake data anyways.”
>>>> 
>>>> Even when the data is fake it is useful. I am developing right now domain reputation specifically looking for verifiably false data as a means of filtering badness. It is immensely useful when criminals lie to me for a variety of reasons. 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> John Bambenek
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:24, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> BTW, in most combat of malicious activities targeting the average user, knowing the actual identity of the perpetrator is not really that useful. Specially because it's likely fake data anyways.
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171020/f9109193/attachment.html>