[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] another document that might be of interest

[Andrew Sullivan]

Hi,

I'm sorry to be testy, but I am losing patience with the way this WG proceeds.  You say nothing at all about how this adds even one scintilla of nuance or information to what we have done so far.  Neither does the reply I've seen on list.  Why should anyone read this document? What additional considerations to the already endless list we have does this document offer?

As near as I can tell, this WG would have better been named the DoS PDP, for "denial of service".  One can't get past the volumes of endless position re-statements and opportunities to explore yet another rathole with no ramifications.  We get no work done.  We are not writing a PhD thesis, where we need to include three literature survey chapters.  I genuinely believe there could be new information in something. But for me to believe there is even one new thing to say about Whois, I'd want the person saying so to offer an argument about what's novel.

Regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 17:47, Victoria Sheckler <vsheckler at riaa.com> wrote:
> 
> I think we missed this document when we were reviewing documents for this WG back in the day, and thought some of you might find it of interest given our current discussions on GDPR
>  
> COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0874:20051011:EN:PDF
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171020/1eab173a/attachment.html>