[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [OFF TOPIC] Hard to push for transparency, unless it starts at the top..

[consult at cgomes.com]

Rob,

As noted in the subject, this is Off Topic at this time so please save it
for later.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:49 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [OFF TOPIC] Hard to push for transparency,
unless it starts at the top..

Hi

> But the real point is/was.. when even a registrar doesn't provide 
> abuse information for their own company via whois.. We won't expect 
> them to worry about customers transparency.

Or perhaps instead of calling out a Registrar about their WHOIS output you
could have actually used the Registrars' WHOIS Server, not some
random-3rd-party when querying data ? 
Or even read the response from the whois you quoted and followed the trail
manually ? 
Or even, heaven-forbid, used some Linux magic and implemented the right
tool/config for the job ;)

> >     Domain Name: REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
> >     Registry Domain ID: 1326800137_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
> >     Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
> >     Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse at enom.com
> >     Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4252982646

So more an issue of education than information, and yet another example of
why having data more-than-once is "just bad" (tm)

Rob


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg