[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy is backwards

[Sara Bockey]

I agree with Steve and look forward to additional feedback from him.

RDS must change.  Discussions to the contrary are a waste of time.

Sara

sara bockey
sr. policy manager | GoDaddy™
sbockey at godaddy.com<mailto:sbockey at godaddy.com>  480-366-3616
skype: sbockey

This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments.


From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 9:27 AM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy is backwards

I am only partially up to speed on the state of discussion within this WG, but I have been following the RDS situation for several years.  In my view, the current focus on GDPR, while understandable because of the looming deadline, is logically backwards.  The challenge, which we tried to address forcefully in 2012, is to rethink the RDS from the ground up.  In my view, this is:

o necessary

o feasible

o will lead to a much cleaner model

o will make it relatively straightforward to satisfy the GDPR and all similar regulations around the world.

There are also some issues such as the relationship of name server operators that also need to be addressed.

There is obviously much more that needs to be said.  I will contribute as much and as quickly as I can.

Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180214/37a1008b/attachment-0001.html>